Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Ukraine War Thread Part 2

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Ukraine War Thread Part 2

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 5th Feb 2024, 11:15
  #8261 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Glorious Devon
Posts: 2,794
Received 1,376 Likes on 825 Posts
So does that make those that shot the pilot terrorists, insurgents or freedom fighters?
Ninthace is online now  
Old 5th Feb 2024, 11:19
  #8262 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,993
Received 2,050 Likes on 920 Posts
“In future packages of military assistance, Ukraine is looking for F-16 aircraft equipped with missiles with a range of 300-500 kilometers” .- Commander of the United Forces of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, Lieutenant General Sergiy Naev.

https://www.rbc.ua/rus/news/naev-ano...707120121.html
ORAC is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2024, 11:26
  #8263 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: aus
Posts: 1,343
Likes: 0
Received 113 Likes on 71 Posts
Originally Posted by ORAC
“In future packages of military assistance, Ukraine is looking for F-16 aircraft equipped with missiles with a range of 300-500 kilometers” .- Commander of the United Forces of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, Lieutenant General Sergiy Naev.

https://www.rbc.ua/rus/news/naev-ano...707120121.html
Not sure that weapon actually exists. JASSM is only one and cant see the US giving up any of those, unless they are going use storm shadow / scalp instead of the SU-24's
rattman is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2024, 11:28
  #8264 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: The back of beyond
Posts: 2,144
Received 177 Likes on 92 Posts
Originally Posted by rattman
Not sure that weapon actually exists. JASSM is only one and cant see the US giving up any of those, unless they are going use storm shadow / scalp instead of the SU-24's
Taurus
melmothtw is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2024, 11:51
  #8265 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,993
Received 2,050 Likes on 920 Posts
JASSM-ER has been on their wish list since the start.

https://en.defence-ua.com/news/arms_...rbes-7713.html

US has already approved it’s sale to Poland….

https://www.dsca.mil/press-media/maj...ssm-er-support
ORAC is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2024, 12:26
  #8266 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Formerly resident of Knoteatingham
Posts: 960
Received 131 Likes on 70 Posts
Originally Posted by langleybaston
Only captured if it was an away game! Otherwise recycled.
Not if, typically, the Resistance got to them first!
BANANASBANANAS is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2024, 13:21
  #8267 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Baston
Posts: 3,326
Received 786 Likes on 270 Posts
Originally Posted by BANANASBANANAS
Not if, typically, the Resistance got to them first!
Not much Resistance in Deutschland
langleybaston is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2024, 14:36
  #8268 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Slovakia
Age: 59
Posts: 283
Received 247 Likes on 41 Posts
Originally Posted by Ninthace
So does that make those that shot the pilot terrorists, insurgents or freedom fighters?
Russians will call them terrorists. If commando consisted of Russians, we may call them insurgents. If they are Russians with Ukrainian nationality, they are guerrillas. If they are infiltrated Ukrainians who secretly passed the border, they are probably special forces.
Of course we talk about deeds on the verge of legality because combatants are supposed to wear uniforms, but given the fact that pilot was engaged in fulfilling illegal orders to attack civilians repeatedly, we may agree that this is somehow acceptable. If he would be killed by a car bomb along with his wife and kids, we would probably condemn it.
Pali is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2024, 15:45
  #8269 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 33,449
Received 3,192 Likes on 1,339 Posts
Originally Posted by Pali
Russians will call them terrorists. If commando consisted of Russians, we may call them insurgents. If they are Russians with Ukrainian nationality, they are guerrillas. If they are infiltrated Ukrainians who secretly passed the border, they are probably special forces.
Of course we talk about deeds on the verge of legality because combatants are supposed to wear uniforms, but given the fact that pilot was engaged in fulfilling illegal orders to attack civilians repeatedly, we may agree that this is somehow acceptable. If he would be killed by a car bomb along with his wife and kids, we would probably condemn it.
I didn't see any qualms about the fact they sent people over the kill Reinhard Heydrich on his drive to work. Both were involved in the murder of innocents, all be it one on a larger scale.
NutLoose is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2024, 15:56
  #8270 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 33,449
Received 3,192 Likes on 1,339 Posts
Shows how bad things are becoming.

A Ukrainian military leader is asking Canada to hand over tens of thousands of rockets that are awaiting demolition at a Saskatchewan military base.

In an exclusive interview with Global News, Lieutenant General Kyrylo Budanov urged the government to let Ukraine have the decommissioned CRV7 rockets.

Doing so would help Ukraine fend off Russian forces and save taxpayers the cost of destroying them, said Lt. Gen. Budanov, chief of the Ukrainian defence ministry’s intelligence directorate.

“We hope it will be a win-win situation,” he said.

More than 83,000 CRV7 ground attack rockets are warehoused at Canadian Forces Ammunition Depot Dundurn, south of Saskatoon.

While Canada no longer has any use for them, and has selected a private contractor to demolish them, Ukraine says it urgently needs them as its supplies of munitions diminish.

Lt. Gen. Budanov said the CRV7s would be used both in Ukrainian attack helicopters and ground launchers to target Russian tanks and artillery.

Ukraine has been discussing the issue with Canada but is still awaiting a decision, he said.

Canadian officials said they were looking into the request, but cautioned the CRV7s are decades old and could have become unstable, rendering them dangerous to handle and transport.

The Ukrainians argue they are in a dire predicament and are willing to assume the risks. They said they are accustomed to handling older munitions like the CRV7s.

“We have no concerns,” Lt. Gen. Budanov said.

Two years after Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered his disastrous invasion, Ukraine is desperately trying to replenish its military arsenal, particularly with munitions.

With neither side holding superiority in the air, the conflict has largely become an artillery battle and the Ukrainians have been scouring the world for whatever supplies they can find.

They believe that about 8,000 of the Canadian rockets are in pristine condition and that some are still fitted with warheads.

Those rockets that are no longer functional will be stripped of their parts for use in Ukraine’s drone program, the officials said.

“We need a lot of equipment, both ammunition, munitions in general, artillery munitions — lots of types of equipment,” Lt. Gen. Budanov said through an interpreter.

A Canadian military spokesperson acknowledged that 83,303 rockets — most of them tubes with rocket motors but no warheads — were awaiting disposal by a contractor.

Aside from concerns about whether they could be safely airlifted, giving them to Ukraine would mean breaking the contract with the disposal company, which has been building a special facility for the job.

Experts canvassed by Global News said rocket propellent had a limited lifespan and could become unstable after so many years.

But since the CRV7s use a solid fuel, they may still be safe, provided they had been stored properly and not exposed to moisture or contamination.

The issue arose in Ottawa on Friday, when the Conservatives said the Canadian military was sitting on the stockpile of rockets.“Instead of making Canadians pay millions of dollars to decommission these weapons, common sense Conservatives are calling on the Trudeau government to give these weapons to Ukraine who can use them in the defence of their sovereignty,” the party said in a statement.

The Liberals accused Opposition leader Pierre Poilievre of “trying to cover up his weak stance on Ukraine by distracting Canadians.”

Defence Minister Bill Blair’s spokesperson said the government was “pursuing testing to ensure that this equipment is operationally effective and safe to transport to Ukraine before any potential donation.”

Ukrainian officials were disappointed to see the issue become politicized.

“Please send it to us as quickly as possible,” said the Ukrainian colonel who leads the team preparing to take possession of the CRV7s. He spoke on the condition he would not be named.

The Canadian Rocket Vehicle, or CRV7, was manufactured by Winnipeg-based Bristol Aerospace and became the NATO standard.

“The power behind the CRV7 is the propellant,” Magellan Aerospace, which took over Bristol, said on its website. “CRV7 is longer range, faster time to target, and superior accuracy.”

Although Canada used CRV7s on aircraft like CF18s, Lt. Gen. Budanov said Ukraine had ground launchers capable of firing them.

Lt. Gen. Budanov, whose wife is recovering after she was allegedly poisoned by Russia, said the rockets would be used as the equivalent of field artillery.

Canadian veterans were working with Ukraine to help with the project, he added.

Asked if he was concerned that Ukraine’s allies were losing interest in the conflict after two years, he said, “It’s not a TV show, to be interested or not. It’s war.”

The Canadian government has committed more than $2.4 billion in military assistance to Ukraine since Russia launched its invasion on Feb. 24 2022.

That includes missiles as well as ammunition for small arms, artillery and battle tanks. Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has promised Ukraine “unwavering support.”

But at a news conference in December, President Voldomyr Zelensky acknowledged his forces were running low of artillery shells.

That is where Canada’s CRV7s come in.

In 2021, the Canadian Armed Forces sought bidders for a contract to “collect, transport, destroy, demilitarize, recycle and dispose of” the CRV7s.

“The entire inventory of rocket motors was shelf-life expired and declared surplus in 2000,” the military said at the time.

“It was removed from the DND/CAF serviceable inventory in 2005 and made available for disposal by destruction.”

There are three types of rockets, according to the contract details: those fully intact and still packaged in their original shipping tube and boxes; scrap motors; and inert dummies.

A Canadian advisor to the Ukrainian military said she was rebuffed when she first approached Ottawa about giving the rockets to Ukraine instead of demolishing them.

“I was told that Canada has looked at it and decided it doesn’t have any value,” Kate McKenna, said.

McKenna started a petition on the issue last December. The fact that Canada was sitting on the munitions “makes me kind of a bit salty,” she said.

“The rockets themselves are made up of a number of parts, including, the casing, the rocket fuel, the motor,” the former British Columbia resident said.

“Each one of those components can be repurposed by the Ukrainians. They are incredibly valuable,” said McKenna.

Ukraine has made similar appeals for junked military equipment to other countries, including Australia, which has 45 retired MRH-90 helicopters that Ukraine wants.

But Australia has deemed them unsafe, and intends to disassemble and bury the choppers, arguing getting them into working condition would be too costly.

“You don’t get to tell Ukraine what is or isn’t a good risk,” McKenna responded. “There are no good risks. Ukrainians are dying and we need to just be brave.”

“Trust Ukraine, trust them to make use of every single piece of that rocket, please. And Ukraine is ready to send over a team,” she said.“They know what they’re doing.”

https://globalnews.ca/news/10271532/...-crv7-rockets/
NutLoose is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 5th Feb 2024, 16:03
  #8271 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 33,449
Received 3,192 Likes on 1,339 Posts
Ukraines new drone and they are already looking at making it NATO compatible.

NutLoose is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2024, 16:09
  #8272 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 33,449
Received 3,192 Likes on 1,339 Posts
The Netherlands are adding another 6 F-16's to the ones they are sending Ukraine.


Last edited by NutLoose; 5th Feb 2024 at 16:26.
NutLoose is offline  
The following 3 users liked this post by NutLoose:
Old 5th Feb 2024, 16:31
  #8273 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Off the map
Posts: 64
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by Ninthace
So does that make those that shot the pilot terrorists, insurgents or freedom fighters?
I guess it depends which side you're on.
DirtyProp is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 5th Feb 2024, 16:54
  #8274 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Co. Down
Age: 83
Posts: 842
Received 247 Likes on 80 Posts
If it's wrong to shoot the pilot on the street, is it wrong to shoot him two days later as he enters the base from which he takes off to bomb civilians in Ukraine, is it wrong to shoot him with a lucky rifle round through the canopy as he takes off? If so, what's the difference?
Geriaviator is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 5th Feb 2024, 17:55
  #8275 (permalink)  
Administrator
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: The Gulf Coast
Posts: 1,749
Received 317 Likes on 146 Posts
For those interested:
the recent news about Hungary, and Sweden's NATO inclusion, has been moved to the Russia vs NATO thread here on the Military Aviation forum.
Please take extra effort to stay on topic.
Thank you all in advance.
T28B
T28B is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2024, 18:05
  #8276 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Oxfordshire
Posts: 19
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
There's another aspect of this 'can we shoot a pilot in the street' debate that troubles me. Amongst the many distressing videos of troops (both sides) being killed/injured by drones, what I find particlulary hard to digest are the videos where troops plainly trying to remove an injured colleague from the battelefield are then themselves hit by further drones.Is that because they have no Red Cross markings...? What happened to the Red Cross symbol in this conflict? Have we all gone beyond respecting the evacuation of the wounded?
Badger3434 is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 5th Feb 2024, 18:54
  #8277 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Baston
Posts: 3,326
Received 786 Likes on 270 Posts
Originally Posted by Badger3434
There's another aspect of this 'can we shoot a pilot in the street' debate that troubles me. Amongst the many distressing videos of troops (both sides) being killed/injured by drones, what I find particlulary hard to digest are the videos where troops plainly trying to remove an injured colleague from the battelefield are then themselves hit by further drones.Is that because they have no Red Cross markings...? What happened to the Red Cross symbol in this conflict? Have we all gone beyond respecting the evacuation of the wounded?
A good point, But I fear Ukr and Ruz have entered what used to be called "savage warfare" in the days of Empire.
Under those [and only those] circumstances the RAMC and its predecessors were musketry-trained and armed. Thus on the NW frontier and against Zulus and Mahdists and other warriors if a wounded man could not be evacuated his best option was to save the last round for himself. In "European Warfare" protection of the RAMC was the task of the ASC component of Field Ambulances, and only the doctors had a pistol.

Returning to the present, I don't think either adversary makes much use of a Geneva Cross ............... the Convention is meaningless to the Orcs.

Last edited by langleybaston; 5th Feb 2024 at 18:56. Reason: addendum
langleybaston is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2024, 20:00
  #8278 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Rhone-Alpes
Posts: 1,218
Received 329 Likes on 181 Posts
Originally Posted by Badger3434
There's another aspect of this 'can we shoot a pilot in the street' debate that troubles me. Amongst the many distressing videos of troops (both sides) being killed/injured by drones, what I find particlulary hard to digest are the videos where troops plainly trying to remove an injured colleague from the battelefield are then themselves hit by further drones.Is that because they have no Red Cross markings...? What happened to the Red Cross symbol in this conflict? Have we all gone beyond respecting the evacuation of the wounded?
"Have we all gone beyond respecting the evacuation of the wounded..................... where troops plainly trying to remove an injured colleague from the battelefield are then themselves hit by further drones."

It has long been a tactic to wound a soldier in the hopes of drawing out more soldiers to rescue him and then shooting as many as possible. . You are correct in saying that Red Cross-marked medics seem to be totally absent, although I don't think many Russians would respect the markings.

Tartiflette Fan is online now  
Old 5th Feb 2024, 20:15
  #8279 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: York
Posts: 630
Received 23 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally Posted by Tartiflette Fan
"Have we all gone beyond respecting the evacuation of the wounded..................... where troops plainly trying to remove an injured colleague from the battelefield are then themselves hit by further drones."

It has long been a tactic to wound a soldier in the hopes of drawing out more soldiers to rescue him and then shooting as many as possible. . You are correct in saying that Red Cross-marked medics seem to be totally absent, although I don't think many Russians would respect the markings.
For that very reason we have always had bombs with time delay fuses, fact of war I’m afraid.
dctyke is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2024, 20:49
  #8280 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,993
Received 2,050 Likes on 920 Posts
“France is ready to supply Ukraine with the latest generation of weapons, such as SCALP missiles and new generation bombs, and this commitment will obviously increase, but not only in terms of the allocated finances, but also in terms of the nature of the weapons, which obviously must be of the highest standard necessary for Ukrainians to be able to defend themselves”

Prime Minister of France Gabriel Attal
ORAC is offline  
The following users liked this post:


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.