Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Cessna 152 gets in the way!

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Cessna 152 gets in the way!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 22nd Aug 2002, 07:52
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: just left of a valley,dorsetestishireland
Age: 58
Posts: 110
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Cessna 152 gets in the way!

Picture this!

Weymouth carnival, lovely day, lovely sea, lovely ice creams, lovely ladies , Harrier GR7 in the distance on its run in to display for the suntanned masses. In it comes, loads of knots - wwwhhhaaattt a Cessna 150 steadily flying over the display area in the bay at 250 ft !! same height as the harrier now rapidly approaching the rear of the Cessna!!! Harrier guy flew straight past very-very close! Harrier guy does a 360 and flies straight past them again !! Should have shot the Cessna down for being such dimwits.
Weymouth is covered by Plymouth Mil, so I dont know what went on there ?
Harrier completed the display and zoomed off, probably to look for the witdims!!
coley chaos is offline  
Old 22nd Aug 2002, 11:50
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: North Weald, UK
Posts: 357
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Picture this (2)

North Weald Air Show 199?.

BBMF are strutting their stuff - the Hurricane is on display and flying up RWY 20. Suddenly it peels up and starts to orbit to the North because...there is a German registered Robin/spam-can/thingie on finals for RWY02.

The D-XXXX eventually decides that further progress is Not A Good Move and sort of breaks right back towards the Fatherland and the show continues.

I couldn't help but feel that is was 'right place, but 50 years too late.'
Who has control? is offline  
Old 22nd Aug 2002, 11:56
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: London, England
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Red face

An airfield in the South East last year. A BBMF Spitfire has been booked to give a flypast.

The time approaches, so flying club decamps onto grass outside clubhouse to watch the fun.

The Mk XIX Spitfire is turning base and a club Cessna 152 starts dragging itself along the grass runway and takes off.

Spitfire hurtles down runway at low level, underneath the 152, does a steep climbing turn crosswind, then comes back for second pass.

Don't know if they'd be willing to do another this year though!

RD
Rallye Driver is offline  
Old 22nd Aug 2002, 16:01
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Bath
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
coley chaos

This isn't an excuse, but from the notams...

RAC : FROM 02/08/02 11:00 TO 02/09/02 07:00 U1698/02
E)PLYMOUTH MILITARY RADAR LARS NOT AVBL

Ian
IanSeager is offline  
Old 22nd Aug 2002, 18:00
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Used to be God's own County
Posts: 1,719
Received 14 Likes on 10 Posts
Civvies don't read NOTAMs, so dimwit would not have known LArs was unavailable!
Sweeping statement but I hear it every weekend......for example...any Brize 134.3 controllers around?
Last weekend saw civvies flying through para drop sites, into their zone etc etc.
Same with Farnborough and its TRA for the show, Reds Temp Airspace, Brighton Political Party conferences - the list is endless.
I was using Brize for a listening watch during flying at Charlbury and could not believe the ignorance of some people.
Many 'pro' civvy pilots out there but unfortunately there seem to be more dunces!!!
No excuse for not reading the notams considering the abundance of software that will print it all out on a pretty map for you.
EESDL is offline  
Old 22nd Aug 2002, 20:46
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Bath
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I agree that not enough people read NOTAMS, but as of yesterday (or perhaps today) the pretty map stuff doesn't work anymore. AIS have changed their site.

It's back to reading the text for now

Ian
IanSeager is offline  
Old 22nd Aug 2002, 21:06
  #7 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
PPRuNe Radar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1997
Location: Europe
Posts: 3,228
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
EESDL

Whilst the point you make is valid, there are quite a few Airprox reports over the years where mil crews seem to have infringed notified CANPs and the like and come close to civil traffic going about their business. Are we to assume all mil pilots don't read CANPs ??

Your generalisation is far too broad.
PPRuNe Radar is offline  
Old 22nd Aug 2002, 21:52
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I only have one thing to say,

Ian S, was it extreme coincidence or are you a NOTAM spotter, I'm actually quite worried at the thought you could recall everyone for recent history.....

ps if that is the case maybe you could fly with me and then I could say "I never bong anything..."

Talk Reaction is offline  
Old 22nd Aug 2002, 22:14
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Northants, UK
Posts: 667
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've listened in to several highly amusing conversations over the years where pilots have been utterly unaware of NOTAMed airspace.

Old Warden - a C150 asking to land, only to be told 'Er, I'd rather you didn't. There's a Harrier about to depart' - this on a well publicised display day.

Or Flying Legends at Duxford, shortly before the big formation at the end, some bloke asking to fly through overhead. '30 assorted warbirds in the overhead, advise staying clear' - delivered in the dryest and most sarcastic tone of voice I've ever heard.

Some bloke in a microlight near Fairford this year also wanted to fly through during the practice displays, briefly argued the toss when told he couldn't too. Beggars belief really.
DamienB is offline  
Old 23rd Aug 2002, 00:00
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Bath
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talk Reaction

Just coincidence. I'd read the thread and was then trying to figure out the new AIS site. I might be many things, but I'm not a NOTAM spotter, or any other kind for that matter :-)

Ian
IanSeager is offline  
Old 23rd Aug 2002, 09:10
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Used to be God's own County
Posts: 1,719
Received 14 Likes on 10 Posts
Told you that it was a sweeping statement.....in the mil guys defence....there is an ever increasing amount of bumf to read before every sortie, it beggars belief, hardly surprising that some get overlooked in these days of over-stretch. Please don't compare that to some dim-wit getting into the air without a cursory glance over one document.
Anybody care to list the documents that have to be read then perhaps our non-mil guys will get an idea of the workload involved!

Ian, can't believe what NATS have done with the NOTAM system.....please tell me someone will get promoted for this latest crass 'improvement' !!
EESDL is offline  
Old 23rd Aug 2002, 09:22
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A disused airfield in East Anglia, NOTAMED for weekend parachuting activity, two student canopies in the air, and two C130's come blasting right through the overhead, very scary indeed. Enquiries via CAA revealed RAF 'unaware' of airfield activity, were using as turning point for navigational excercises!

It's not always the weekend warrior in his spamcan that f***s up.

Thank you for your attention.
Surly Bondslipper is offline  
Old 23rd Aug 2002, 13:54
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 588
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There's obviously so much to read that you don't have time to plan a sortie that doesn't take you within a gnats's todger of my ATZ of through the Instrument Approach, which (due to the complete lack of airspace policy in the UK) happens to be in the FIR!!
matspart3 is offline  
Old 23rd Aug 2002, 14:36
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Used to be God's own County
Posts: 1,719
Received 14 Likes on 10 Posts
Couldn't agree more, let's regulate the whole of our airspace then there would not be any infringements...'cos we'd be already in it!! Works for London.

Seen it myself in Flt Planning......clerk misplots/omits point entirely, captain gets it in the neck!!! RAF still work the policy that everyone apart the captain cannot be held responsible if it all goes pear-shaped.........so, if the capt has to double-check everything anyway, why bother with the clerks?

Certain tasks are delegated but not sufficiently monitored.......point being: The mil pilot has to check countless docs, the civ pilot very few (I know 'cos I am one).

Hells bells, I fly with pilots who don't even know the RF 'phone number!! Scary world out there, so like I said before, let's regulate all of the airspace
EESDL is offline  
Old 23rd Aug 2002, 15:09
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 588
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I accept that a disappointingly large number of PPL's fail to brief themselves adequately. There's no excuse. Being an ATCO at a very busy, predominantley GA airfield, I'm often on the wrong end of converstions with people who shouldn't be let out with a shopping trolley, let alone half a ton of flying metal.
My point, however, is that military sorties are often flown extremely close my ATZ and regularly through the Instrument Approach procedures. IMHO, this is equally silly. The ATZ dimensions offer no effective protection to my traffic. Flying a 3° glidepath on the instrument approach will put you below 1000' over a mile from the ATZ boundary and the circuit often extends beyond 2 miles when we're integrating Learjets with Cessna 150's. Wouldn't it be mutually beneficial if the military gave busy civil fields in the FIR a wider berth? Maybe MATZ dimensions?
matspart3 is offline  
Old 24th Aug 2002, 12:07
  #16 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: just left of a valley,dorsetestishireland
Age: 58
Posts: 110
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Divergent,

The Cessna was ( I can only assume ) following the coast line around Weymouth Bay from the Bournemouth direction towards Exeter? From a previous post, Plymouth Mil are non operational so the "dimwit Cessna" should have been in contact last with Bournemouth ATC .

The reds would of loved this chap come chuffing on by the way he did!! And im not sure but the reds may of taken off from Hurn anyway.

The 152 was following the beach line no more than 300 ft out. Weymouth beach holds 150 thousand plus people on carnival day,and thats not counting the thousands in the shark free shallow waters!

One baffleing thing though, there was a specialy cordoned off part of the water for the hover part of the harrier routine, only for the harrier to spot hover in between the gin palaces and canoes etc. made for funny watching as dinner accesories and table cloths were scattered to the exhaust forces.!!
coley chaos is offline  
Old 24th Aug 2002, 16:13
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Blighty
Posts: 4,789
Received 8 Likes on 4 Posts
Or perhaps MPS, you should lobby the CAA for an extension of your ATZ to cover the procedure. Flying a published instrument procedure in class G airspace without any protection is unique to the UK (I think). Any pilot flying VFR in good VMC could reasonably be forgiven for thinking that as the weather is good, he may not be required to give the ILS 'feathers' sticking out of an ATZ a wide berth.

Before I receive the inevitable lambasting for this statement, I would like to point out that this seems to be the attitude from the CAA - due to the acceptance of this situation. And I have seen this from both sides of the coin.
Dan Winterland is offline  
Old 25th Aug 2002, 06:12
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 1,089
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cessna 152

Why do we not all accept that there are complete idiots in the air in both military and civilian aircraft? The military are no better or worse at observing the rules than are the civvies. I will not attempt to list such occurrences but they are VERY VERY numerous. What is particularly galling , however, is the fact that so very often the mil boys(and girls?) are not prosecuted because it is impossible to identify them. If you want an example a harrier at<500 ft throught the overhead of an ATZ and when reported the military unit asked for the registration "Without which we cannot identify the pilot" !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Try reading that from a 400+ knot aircraft. So if any of you want to identify and stop the idiots in all branches of flying advice would be welcomed.
WorkingHard is offline  
Old 25th Aug 2002, 21:22
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking

Plymouth Mil are currently 'off for a month' apparently.
Getting there arses spanked at home instead of at work presumably.
Cattivo is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.