Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Time to reconsider Turkey inside NATO?

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Time to reconsider Turkey inside NATO?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10th Nov 2017, 08:30
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Off the map
Posts: 64
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
Time to reconsider Turkey inside NATO?

According to some commentators, we should think about it:

Kick Turkey out of Nato: Think tank demands action over Erdogan?s rising autocracy | World | News | Express.co.uk

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry...b0204d0c1713db

PS: these are not necessarily my views.
DirtyProp is offline  
Old 10th Nov 2017, 08:56
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: SW England
Age: 77
Posts: 3,896
Received 17 Likes on 5 Posts
We once had a FEAF ranger cancelled at Akrotiri because the Turks decided to withdraw our diplomatic clearance to overfly. This meant that instead of a nice trip to Singapore we just flew back to Marham the following day. That was around 1972 and I've never trusted Turkey as a NATO ally since!
Tankertrashnav is offline  
Old 10th Nov 2017, 10:40
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: the heathen lands
Posts: 357
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Turkey is a nightmare, if its an ally then my children are quiet, well behaved and tidy - however the only thing worse than Turkey in NATO is Turkey not in NATO...

you think they are bad now, wait till they go fully freelance.

the one upside pehaps is that they might not get F-35...
cokecan is offline  
Old 10th Nov 2017, 11:07
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And they are very sound on Russians and the causes of Russians..............

Strategically they really extend the problems Russia would have if it were to think of warming things up

And, TBH, they are a lot better than some of our current and past allies.........
Heathrow Harry is offline  
Old 10th Nov 2017, 11:52
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Not far from EGPH.
Posts: 117
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by cokecan
you think they are bad now, wait till they go fully freelance.

the one upside pehaps is that they might not get F-35...
But then who would service our F-35s' engines?
XR219 is offline  
Old 10th Nov 2017, 12:01
  #6 (permalink)  
ICM
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Bishops Stortford, UK
Age: 83
Posts: 473
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Having lived with the Salazar regime in Portugal and that of the Greek Colonels, I'd be very surprised to see any NATO move to expel Turkey. Most capitals will presumably be quietly hoping that the Erdogan era will one day pass into history as those did.
ICM is offline  
Old 10th Nov 2017, 13:05
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question is is NATO a military alliance or a political/economic alliance?

If it's is the first then you have to accept some roughs with the smooth
Heathrow Harry is offline  
Old 10th Nov 2017, 15:29
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: NEW YORK
Posts: 1,352
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Equally relevant would be the question of why Turkey stays in NATO, now that Europe has shown it the door.
etudiant is offline  
Old 10th Nov 2017, 15:49
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: over the rainbow
Age: 75
Posts: 562
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Surely it was Turkey's strategic position during the Cold War which was all important. US air bases, US missiles sited there.

Didn't JFK cut a deal with the USSR to remove some missiles from Turkey if the USSR agreed to remove its missiles from Cuba.
roving is offline  
Old 10th Nov 2017, 17:03
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Redstone's IIRC....... and Turkey was critical as it filled the gap between Europe and the Middle East

NATO was never just about Europe - it was to keep the Russians in place - (or "encircled" if you look from Red Square)
Heathrow Harry is offline  
Old 11th Nov 2017, 12:34
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Texas
Age: 65
Posts: 7,348
Received 522 Likes on 328 Posts
Originally Posted by Heathrow Harry
Question is is NATO a military alliance or a political/economic alliance?

If it's is the first then you have to accept some roughs with the smooth
Harry, the answer to that has always been Yes. (It's both).

I will also note that if any of you take a peak at the North Atlantic Treaty (aka Washington Treaty), which is the founding document of NATO, you will see that there is no provision for ejection from the alliance. There is, however, provision for leaving the alliance with a one year's notice.
Article 13
After the Treaty has been in force for twenty years, any Party may cease to be a Party one year after its notice of denunciation has been given to the Government of the United States of America, which will inform the Governments of the other Parties of the deposit of each notice of denunciation.
That means that as long as Turkey finds it useful to be in the NATO alliance, it can remain within it.
Lonewolf_50 is offline  
Old 11th Nov 2017, 14:32
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Now that is something that I'd never realised - many thanks...................
Heathrow Harry is offline  
Old 11th Nov 2017, 15:14
  #13 (permalink)  

"Mildly" Eccentric Stardriver
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: England
Age: 77
Posts: 4,176
Received 245 Likes on 76 Posts
"Keep your friends close, but keep your enemies closer"
Herod is offline  
Old 11th Nov 2017, 20:00
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 1,958
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's been argued that for practical purposes Turkey have already left; every single NATO liaison officer has either been recalled and arrested or has claimed asylum overseas. This even includes one unfortunate officer who was in Intensive care due to a road accident at the time of the coup attempt!
ShotOne is offline  
Old 12th Nov 2017, 12:26
  #15 (permalink)  
Administrator
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: The Gulf Coast
Posts: 1,749
Received 317 Likes on 146 Posts
@SHotOne I think that the Turkish government sent "politically reliable" replacements already to NATO HQ and SHAPE, at the least.
T28B is offline  
Old 12th Nov 2017, 22:30
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: NEW YORK
Posts: 1,352
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Presumably some personnel rotation is normal after a failed military coup?
I'm not really up on the protocol for such situations.
etudiant is offline  
Old 13th Nov 2017, 06:58
  #17 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,993
Received 2,048 Likes on 919 Posts
Redstone's IIRC.......
PGM-Jupiter owned by the US army. The UK got the longer range PGM-17 Thor.
ORAC is online now  
Old 20th Nov 2017, 13:01
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: 1 Dunghill Mansions, Putney
Posts: 1,797
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
US-Turkey war of words on S-400, F-35 escalates fast
As the U.S. and NATO pressure mounts on Turkey to stop the purchase of the powerful S-400 missile system from Russia, the American administration has threatened that it may not go forward with a plan to deliver F-35 fighter jets ordered by Turkey.

In retaliation to the American blackmail, Ankara may take measures of its own in response, atop of which is the possible dismantling of the powerful Malatya-Kürecik AN-TPY-2 radar that was set up by the U.S. in 2012.

This will lead to Israel being widely exposed to ballistic missile threats, as the Kürecik radar [has] been set up with the purpose of detecting any missile fired at Israel.
Ian Corrigible is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.