Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

NZ Govt considering x2 RNZAF C-17s

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

NZ Govt considering x2 RNZAF C-17s

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 16th Apr 2015, 11:07
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: A better place.
Posts: 2,325
Received 26 Likes on 18 Posts
NZ Govt considering x2 RNZAF C-17s

Well, it seems you chaps may have been right:
Two new Boeing C-17s to cost NZDF $600m - Business - NZ Herald News'
They're certainly sounding serious, and the money's being budgeted for.
Could politicians actually be about to make a sensible decision?
They should just bite the bullet and buy 4 of the damn things.
Now wait for the Greens to start wailing...
And while we're at it, why on earth they didn't just buy Blackhawks instead of those NH-90 pieces of junk...
tartare is offline  
Old 16th Apr 2015, 11:52
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: The wrong time zone...
Posts: 855
Received 70 Likes on 27 Posts
Hope NZ gets them. Best "off the shelf" purchase the RAAF ever made!
josephfeatherweight is offline  
Old 16th Apr 2015, 12:52
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: home for good
Posts: 495
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Anyone suggested leasing them and then ending up paying for them again when you buy them and some more? no? just the UK then
Sandy Parts is offline  
Old 16th Apr 2015, 13:26
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: ɐıןɐɹʇsn∀
Posts: 1,994
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Kiwis are pretty switched on (NH-90 aside). The Skyhawk decision, whilst derided in some quarters was sound. I expect this purchase to go through tbh.
Hempy is offline  
Old 16th Apr 2015, 23:49
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 370
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Those planes would be used (among other things) for disaster relief and supplying aid, that's something not even the most ardent treehugger could gripe about.
flyinkiwi is offline  
Old 17th Apr 2015, 00:02
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 1,346
Received 31 Likes on 12 Posts
I would have thought a partnership/combined squadron with the RAAF is worth considering ...
reynoldsno1 is offline  
Old 17th Apr 2015, 08:17
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Dar Nunder
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That's far too sensible an idea
etimegev is offline  
Old 17th Apr 2015, 08:39
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: NSW
Posts: 4,307
Received 48 Likes on 36 Posts
Combined squadron not required when 3 hours away is a Sim/training facility maintenance etc etc.

Sovereignty is important.
TBM-Legend is offline  
Old 17th Apr 2015, 12:19
  #9 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 81
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Sandy, wasn't buying them cheaper than the excess mileage charge
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 17th Apr 2015, 14:04
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: New Braunfels, TX
Age: 70
Posts: 1,954
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Those planes would be used (among other things) for disaster relief and supplying aid, that's something not even the most ardent treehugger could gripe about.
I believe you are under estimating the ardency of many tree huggers, who will insist the C-17s be fueled by 100% "carbon neutral" biofuel.
KenV is offline  
Old 17th Apr 2015, 19:47
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: In the Ether
Posts: 437
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"Sandy, wasn't buying them cheaper than the excess mileage charge "

Pretty sure the UK didn't win that one - IIRC the rental was such that a single hour flown beyond the agreement would've made it cheaper to buy in the first place.
And that was a 4-year lease that then took until 2008 to buy them outright.

Still the best acquisition the RAF has made in a long time though...one day we might even use then beyond Strat AT cart horses.
Uncle Ginsters is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.