Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Possible Nuclear Accident

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Possible Nuclear Accident

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 24th Sep 2013, 07:38
  #61 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: sussex
Posts: 1,851
Received 23 Likes on 16 Posts
The UK/US 'nukes' discussion has been very informative to this ex 'truckie' who may well have transported nuclear material in the Herc. (RLF ?)
I wonder if anyone can comment on what the early USSR nuclear devices were like from a safety and effective point of view.
ancientaviator62 is offline  
Old 24th Sep 2013, 08:51
  #62 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 81
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
CM, spares wise there were some bits

The batteries were SAFT and I bought some of these one time. The SEF key as well was probably designed at great expense through an MOD contract but not patented. I first found an advert in Motor Sport where you could change your ignition lock to this new barrel type.

Next they were fitted to gaming machines and now to security locks of all sorts.

In RAF use the keys were in unique pairs for each weapon. We found one unique pair was identical with another unique pair . I can't remember how we found out.
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 24th Sep 2013, 16:19
  #63 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
last time I saw a bomb truck was on the A33 north of Basingstoke a couple of years back - it was parked in a lay-by by itself and was accompanied by a very bored looking copper in a panda car - so I guess it was empty and had broken down en-route during the night................
Heathrow Harry is offline  
Old 24th Sep 2013, 19:26
  #64 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Exiled in England
Age: 48
Posts: 1,015
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Dunno about the " bomb" truck but I am very regularly seeing a mil plated foden IIRC heavy hauler with the Shiniest curtainsider and a " funny" tint to the cab windows.
Not hard to spot an SNM truck either coming or going from Guzz....
I like to play spot the subtle escort vehicle.

I haven't yet managed to catch a glimpse of a flask wagon on the railway but I hear slow heavy trains rolling up the line late at night.

I'm a sad spotter ain't I.
cornish-stormrider is offline  
Old 24th Sep 2013, 19:46
  #65 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Southern Europe
Posts: 5,350
Received 18 Likes on 7 Posts
PN,

Yes indeed. The keys have appeared on threads here. Sorry, the "unique" keys. But doesn't it make you feel good to know all the good things like security keys that came out of our nuclear programme?

Maybe the Pikeys were only after the easily disposable spares and not the physics package. If only they'd realized how warm it would have kept their caravans at night.

cornish-stormrider,

Probably a good thing being a "sad spotter" of these things where you are. It must be very comforting for you that they found such a good use for some of those disused tin mines. Fortunately, the background radiation from the granite-produced radon will mask the small additional emissions from the waste.

Last edited by Courtney Mil; 24th Sep 2013 at 19:47.
Courtney Mil is offline  
Old 24th Sep 2013, 19:56
  #66 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Exiled in England
Age: 48
Posts: 1,015
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Rule one of fight club
Don't talk about the mines......
Etc.
cornish-stormrider is offline  
Old 24th Sep 2013, 21:38
  #67 (permalink)  
None but a blockhead
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: London, UK
Posts: 535
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As a v young schoolkid in early 70s Plymuff, long before I could tell the difference between Mutton Cove, Union Street and the oddly-bumpy Crownhill, I do remember being given iodine tablets 'just in case' we needed them.

One day, I would like to know a bit more about that.
Self Loading Freight is offline  
Old 25th Sep 2013, 04:53
  #68 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: by the Great Salt Lake, USA
Posts: 1,542
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention:
CDC Radiation Emergencies | Facts About Potassium Iodide (KI)
KI (potassium iodide) is a salt of stable (not radioactive) iodine that can help block radioactive iodine from being absorbed by the thyroid gland, thus protecting this gland from radiation injury.

The thyroid gland is the part of the body that is most sensitive to radioactive iodine.

People should take KI (potassium iodide) only on the advice of public health or emergency management officials. There are health risks associated with taking KI.

KI (potassium iodide) does not keep radioactive iodine from entering the body and cannot reverse the health effects caused by radioactive iodine once the thyroid is damaged.
  • KI (potassium iodide) only protects the thyroid, not other parts of the body, from radioactive iodine.
KI (potassium iodide) cannot protect the body from radioactive elements other than radioactive iodine—if radioactive iodine is not present, taking KI is not protective and could cause harm.

Table salt and foods rich in iodine do not contain enough iodine to block radioactive iodine from getting into your thyroid gland. Do not use table salt or food as a substitute for KI.

Do not use dietary supplements that contain iodine in the place of KI (potassium iodide). They can be harmful and non-efficacious. Only use products that have been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

Last edited by GreenKnight121; 25th Sep 2013 at 04:53.
GreenKnight121 is offline  
Old 25th Sep 2013, 07:31
  #69 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: uk
Posts: 162
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Foden was the TCHD Mk2, I only ever came across the tractor unit which was a heavily modified rigid truck to take a 5th wheel as well as all the security devices, I do know the cab weighed in excess of 3 tonnes. A pity Foden fell foul of, allegedly, miss-management.
kaitakbowler is offline  
Old 25th Sep 2013, 10:18
  #70 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Southern Europe
Posts: 5,350
Received 18 Likes on 7 Posts
Here we go. Now we can all be spotters.

NukeWatch UK | How to spot a nuclear weapons convoy
Courtney Mil is offline  
Old 25th Sep 2013, 10:26
  #71 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 81
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
CM, ty.

In 1974 the convoy was more discrete. A couple of RAFP on Norton (IIRC) bikes, the load carrier and tractor and a spare load carrier and tractor. There then followed a 'bread van'.

While it looked like a bread van it was then resplendent in matt green paint. It contained the immediate crash rescue kit.

That and a JU was your lot.

They were only just considering terrorist threats and discussing the possibility of RM stand-off escorts. Naturally, with turf wars, there was light blue resistance to another service taking part in our super secret work.
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 25th Sep 2013, 14:56
  #72 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 83
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If you Google "Nuclear Convoys", you can see the Foden's used as well as a picture of how they cradled the we177 device.
VIProds is offline  
Old 25th Sep 2013, 17:37
  #73 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Southern Europe
Posts: 5,350
Received 18 Likes on 7 Posts
Do you mean this one?



WE177 carefully craddled in a white-painted antique bookcase.

And here's the photo taken at the scene of a Foden truck having a puncture on the A1.



Courtney Mil is offline  
Old 25th Sep 2013, 18:02
  #74 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
TBH no-one would notice..............

of course the BIG UK near-miss was the collision between HMS Vanguard & Le Triomphant in 2009

FHS - TWO SSBN's............ I know there have been a few bumps between SSN's but that one really takes the biscuit

I thought ramming went out in the 1890's/.................
Heathrow Harry is offline  
Old 25th Sep 2013, 18:05
  #75 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 81
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
CM, you are joking .

Given what you did to Sadam's bunkers I don't know how that would have survived
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 25th Sep 2013, 19:53
  #76 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Exiled in England
Age: 48
Posts: 1,015
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ah the ws3 drop hangers that "no longer exist" at various places...
cornish-stormrider is offline  
Old 26th Sep 2013, 15:40
  #77 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: A place in the sun
Age: 82
Posts: 1,291
Received 83 Likes on 34 Posts
And there were some other close shaves:- http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-24280831
Bergerie1 is offline  
Old 26th Sep 2013, 15:50
  #78 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,994
Received 2,050 Likes on 920 Posts
Palomares Summary Report
ORAC is offline  
Old 26th Sep 2013, 16:43
  #79 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Devon
Posts: 2,852
Received 63 Likes on 27 Posts
Originally Posted by Heathhrow Harry
TBH no-one would notice..............

of course the BIG UK near-miss was the collision between HMS Vanguard & Le Triomphant in 2009

FHS - TWO SSBN's............ I know there have been a few bumps between SSN's but that one really takes the biscuit

I thought ramming went out in the 1890's/.................
What makes you think that would compromise either warhead or reactor safety?

Originally Posted by Pontius Navigator
In 1974 the convoy was more discrete. A couple of RAFP on Norton (IIRC) bikes, the load carrier and tractor and a spare load carrier and tractor. There then followed a 'bread van'.

While it looked like a bread van it was then resplendent in matt green paint. It contained the immediate crash rescue kit.

That and a JU was your lot.

They were only just considering terrorist threats and discussing the possibility of RM stand-off escorts. Naturally, with turf wars, there was light blue resistance to another service taking part in our super secret work.
Surely a job for the RAF Regiment?
WE Branch Fanatic is online now  
Old 26th Sep 2013, 16:53
  #80 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
WEBF

Do you think that an accidental collision between two vessels each with a reactor and maybe a total of 96 warheads is SAFE????

Probably the warheads wouldn't go off (but that's the subject of this whole thread) but if the reactor area had been hit and breached rather than a rather slow bump amidships then you would certainly have had some radioactive spillage
Heathrow Harry is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.