Libyan Manpads Go Missing
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
Thread Starter
Libyan Manpads Go Missing
Independent: Hundreds of missiles go missing from regime's abandoned arms dumps
As rebels take over, fears rise that huge arsenal may have fallen into the hands of terrorists
The long metal crates strewn on the grounds of the warehouse were empty. Hundreds of surface-to-air missiles, craved by terrorist groups and "rogue states", had disappeared in the past few days, looted from one of Libya's overflowing arms dumps.
Among the missiles taken away were 480 Russian-built SA-24s, designed for use against modern warplanes, which the US had been attempting to block from falling into Iranian hands, and the older SA-7s and 9s, capable of bringing down commercial airliners, which al-Qa'ida has been striving to obtain.
As Libya's bloody civil war reaches its conclusion, myriad bunkers and barracks containing the regime's weaponry, from Kalashnikovs to missiles, armoured cars and tanks, have been left unguarded, many to be stripped bare by militia fighters and the public.
The numbers involved are far larger than the caches that armed the insurgencies in Iraq and Afghanistan. And in Libya there are even fewer guards at these sites. Unlike those two fronts of the "war on terror", there are no foreign troops present in Libya, and the opposition forming the new government has its resources tied up attempting to subdue the remaining loyalist strongholds and repairing infrastructure to safeguard the arsenals.
The ransacking of the depots containing missiles has set alarms ringing among security agencies in America and Europe. The SA-24 "Grinch" surface-to-air missile targets fighter-bombers, helicopter gunships such as Apaches, and even Cruise missiles, and can strike at as high as 11,000ft. Washington had lobbied the Russians to block sales to Hugo Chavez in Venezuela and to Tehran. The SA-7s and 9s are older but can destroy civilian jets or be used against military targets such as the drones increasingly employed by the US.
Peter Bouckaert, emergencies director for Human Rights Watch, charting the arms depots, said: "The problem is pretty huge. There are around 20,000 surface-to-air missiles in Libya and a hell of a lot of them are missing. The Western agencies are obviously pretty concerned. This lot can turn the whole of North Africa into a no-fly zone."....................
As rebels take over, fears rise that huge arsenal may have fallen into the hands of terrorists
The long metal crates strewn on the grounds of the warehouse were empty. Hundreds of surface-to-air missiles, craved by terrorist groups and "rogue states", had disappeared in the past few days, looted from one of Libya's overflowing arms dumps.
Among the missiles taken away were 480 Russian-built SA-24s, designed for use against modern warplanes, which the US had been attempting to block from falling into Iranian hands, and the older SA-7s and 9s, capable of bringing down commercial airliners, which al-Qa'ida has been striving to obtain.
As Libya's bloody civil war reaches its conclusion, myriad bunkers and barracks containing the regime's weaponry, from Kalashnikovs to missiles, armoured cars and tanks, have been left unguarded, many to be stripped bare by militia fighters and the public.
The numbers involved are far larger than the caches that armed the insurgencies in Iraq and Afghanistan. And in Libya there are even fewer guards at these sites. Unlike those two fronts of the "war on terror", there are no foreign troops present in Libya, and the opposition forming the new government has its resources tied up attempting to subdue the remaining loyalist strongholds and repairing infrastructure to safeguard the arsenals.
The ransacking of the depots containing missiles has set alarms ringing among security agencies in America and Europe. The SA-24 "Grinch" surface-to-air missile targets fighter-bombers, helicopter gunships such as Apaches, and even Cruise missiles, and can strike at as high as 11,000ft. Washington had lobbied the Russians to block sales to Hugo Chavez in Venezuela and to Tehran. The SA-7s and 9s are older but can destroy civilian jets or be used against military targets such as the drones increasingly employed by the US.
Peter Bouckaert, emergencies director for Human Rights Watch, charting the arms depots, said: "The problem is pretty huge. There are around 20,000 surface-to-air missiles in Libya and a hell of a lot of them are missing. The Western agencies are obviously pretty concerned. This lot can turn the whole of North Africa into a no-fly zone."....................
Worrying indeed - but we should have had this down as a campaign objective if the stocks of these things were known. It's a hornet's nest of our own making. You can bet that foreign agents were inside Libya as soon as these ammo dumps were exposed. Phalanx deployed to Heathrow anyone???
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Barnsley
Age: 64
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Bit of a Bugger this one
Bit of a bugger is this one, good news no Weapons of Mass Destruction in Libya but, bad news every johnny running around with a Surface to Air Sytem and some may not be nice folk.
Bit of a bugger is a bit of an understatement, but it's not like we rushed into this without thinking it through, so I can't understand how we might have got in to this situation.
That said, and before anyone else has a go at the Independent for sloppy journalism, the SA-9 isn't a MANPADs - it's mounted in 4 launch tubes on the back of a BRDM-2 if memory serves and is quite an early generation system. So all in all not so much of a problem if all they have is the missiles and not the rest of the kit to use them. The 24 on the other hand, now that's what I would be worried about, especially if Gadhaffi bought them as MANDPADS rather than vehicle mounted systems
That said, and before anyone else has a go at the Independent for sloppy journalism, the SA-9 isn't a MANPADs - it's mounted in 4 launch tubes on the back of a BRDM-2 if memory serves and is quite an early generation system. So all in all not so much of a problem if all they have is the missiles and not the rest of the kit to use them. The 24 on the other hand, now that's what I would be worried about, especially if Gadhaffi bought them as MANDPADS rather than vehicle mounted systems
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Australia - South of where I'd like to be !
Age: 59
Posts: 4,261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Not good at all.
I thought the US was keeping a whole load of sites under observation or was that only the known Chemical weapons and other weapons ?
.
I thought the US was keeping a whole load of sites under observation or was that only the known Chemical weapons and other weapons ?
.
SCAFITE wrote
Libya at the start of the conflict still had a stockpile of Mustard Gas awaiting disposal. The Libyans got an extension for disposal. This was obviously interupted by the conflict.
OPCW Director-General Meets Permanent Representative of the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya
OPCW Director-General Meets Permanent Representative of the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya
Friday, 11 March 2011
The OPCW Director-General, Ambassador Ahmet Üzümcü, today asked the Permanent Representative of the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya to call on him at the OPCW Headquarters. The Director-General expressed the concerns of States Parties regarding the status of those chemical weapons possessed by Libya that remain to be destroyed, pursuant to its obligations under the Chemical Weapons Convention. He recalled that the responsibility for the physical security of those chemical weapons belongs entirely to Libya, and asked that every possible measure be taken to prevent their possible use.
The Permanent Representative reiterated to the Director-General the Libyan commitment to the implementation of the Convention, and that in accordance with the information he has received from Tripoli, the situation regarding the chemical weapons to be destroyed remains unchanged and under control.
Libya's WMD Stockpiles Are Secure: Pentagon - Defense News
TJ
Bit of a bugger is this one, good news no Weapons of Mass Destruction in Libya but,...
OPCW Director-General Meets Permanent Representative of the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya
OPCW Director-General Meets Permanent Representative of the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya
Friday, 11 March 2011
The OPCW Director-General, Ambassador Ahmet Üzümcü, today asked the Permanent Representative of the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya to call on him at the OPCW Headquarters. The Director-General expressed the concerns of States Parties regarding the status of those chemical weapons possessed by Libya that remain to be destroyed, pursuant to its obligations under the Chemical Weapons Convention. He recalled that the responsibility for the physical security of those chemical weapons belongs entirely to Libya, and asked that every possible measure be taken to prevent their possible use.
The Permanent Representative reiterated to the Director-General the Libyan commitment to the implementation of the Convention, and that in accordance with the information he has received from Tripoli, the situation regarding the chemical weapons to be destroyed remains unchanged and under control.
Libya's WMD Stockpiles Are Secure: Pentagon - Defense News
TJ
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Perth Western Australia
Age: 57
Posts: 808
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Libya at the start of the conflict still had a stockpile of Mustard Gas awaiting disposal. The Libyans got an extension for disposal. This was obviously interupted by the conflict.
WMD was never a priority for Ghadaffi. Libya had a small and not very advanced chemical weapons programme until about the mid 90s. He ended that programme when UK & France rebuilt diplomatic & security relations and put in place trade-incentives.
Any chemical weapons discovered would be leftovers from that defunct programme, and were probably declared previously anyway. It would be very surprising if the Libyans had desired or managed to keep an active programme secret.
In any case, mustard gas can barely be classified as WMD. There are many "conventional" weapons that are far more destructive.
Any chemical weapons discovered would be leftovers from that defunct programme, and were probably declared previously anyway. It would be very surprising if the Libyans had desired or managed to keep an active programme secret.
In any case, mustard gas can barely be classified as WMD. There are many "conventional" weapons that are far more destructive.
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: by the Great Salt Lake, USA
Posts: 1,542
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Trim Stab
In any case, mustard gas can barely be classified as WMD.
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Craggy Island
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Phil9560
Mustard gas is a chemical weapon and, by current definition, very much a WMD.
Still, much more concerned (ie scared sh!teless) about losing track of a shed-load of SA-24s.
Still, much more concerned (ie scared sh!teless) about losing track of a shed-load of SA-24s.
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Malkin Tower
Posts: 847
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
lets just say when I discovered a supply route for 2-Chloroethanol and 1,1'-Dithiodiethanol into a middle east country in 1984, all **** hit the fan. I've never seen politicians move so fast. An Order in Council banning certain selected exports within two days of the report. A similar European Union order two days later.
The authorities were worried then about mustard, and they should still be worried
The authorities were worried then about mustard, and they should still be worried
Father Jack-my remark wasn't intended to sound quite as glib as it did so I stand corrected
But when I think of WMD I tend to instinctively think Nuclear.If it had to be either in Central London Mustard Gas has to be the lesser of the two evils.
But when I think of WMD I tend to instinctively think Nuclear.If it had to be either in Central London Mustard Gas has to be the lesser of the two evils.