Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Strategic Bomber Cost

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Strategic Bomber Cost

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 3rd Apr 2011, 07:00
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: New York & California
Posts: 414
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Strategic Bomber Cost

As I understand it, when it comes to attack/light-bombers: The A-20 Havoc costed around 75,000 dollars; the A-26 Invader around 245,000 dollars; the B-57 Canberra around 1.2 million dollars.

When it comes to medium bombers: The B-25 Mitchell costed around 96,000 to 145,000 dollars; the B-26, around 120,000 and 125,000 dollars; the B-45 around 1.1 million; the B-47, around 1.9 million dollars; the B-58 Hustler, approximately 12.4 million dollars.

In regards to heavy-bombers: The B-17 costed around 240,000 dollars, the B-24, around 300,000; the B-29 around 640,000; the B-36 costed 4.1 million (all of which were heavy bombers).

Now with all this said. I'm wondering how much the B-52A, and the B-52H costed, and how much the B-70 would have costed assuming 250 of them were built as the USAF intended?


R.C.
No, I'm not a bean-counter!
Jane-DoH is offline  
Old 3rd Apr 2011, 09:04
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 83
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
JD Courtesy of wikipedia,:

B-52 B US$14.43million
B-52 H US$ 9.28million (1962)
B-52 H US$53.4million (1998)
B-70 Valkyrie US$750million
VIProds is offline  
Old 4th Apr 2011, 02:31
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: New York & California
Posts: 414
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
VIProds

I'm aware of the 750 million dollar figure for the B-70 as only two were produced. If 250 were produced, do you know how much it would have costed per unit? I assume more material and facilities would have had to been set up to build all these things, more engines would have had to been built and so forth.
Jane-DoH is offline  
Old 4th Apr 2011, 06:25
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Just south of the Keevil gap.
Posts: 308
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
J-D,
An estimate of the upc can be obtained by the application of Learner theory
You would need to know the Year of Economics of the $750M cost and a realisic estimate of the learner rate of the company based on historical performance.

Putting the $750M figure into the calculator on the NASA site, using the Wright method with a learner factor of 85% gives a UPC for the 250th article of $157M.

What you were doing in your first post is called a Historical Trend Analysis (HTA). If you plot the costs on a chart, you can use linear regression techniques to predict future costs.


I've clearly been associating with bean-counters for far too long!
Cpt_Pugwash is offline  
Old 4th Apr 2011, 07:52
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: netherlands
Age: 57
Posts: 769
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
An earlier stealth fighter/attack jet, the Navy's A-12, was canceled due to cost overruns -- but only after nearly $5 billion had gone down the tubes. And the B-2 bomber, with its $2.2 billion price tag per plane, has a design life span of only 30 years. That's a depreciation of some $8,300 an hour -- whether it's in flight or not, whether it's invisible or not.
The Pentagon's 300-Billion-Dollar Bomb | Mother Jones
keesje is offline  
Old 4th Apr 2011, 12:26
  #6 (permalink)  
Cunning Artificer
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: The spiritual home of DeHavilland
Age: 76
Posts: 3,127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The B-17 costed around 240,000 dollars, the B-24, around 300,000;
To put that in perspective, the Royal Navy's 1,350 ton Fleet Destroyers (Classes A to I ), crewed by 145 (peace-time complement) cost £300,000 pounds apiece, as commissioned.
Blacksheep is offline  
Old 4th Apr 2011, 12:44
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Texas
Age: 65
Posts: 7,348
Received 521 Likes on 327 Posts
Jane, are you using a constant year dollar figure (inflation adjusted) to arrive at your costs?

Given how big production runs were for B-17, B-25, and B-24, is the cost comparison very useful?

We didn't get half way to three digits on the B-2 ... which I think informs us a bit on its outrageous costs.
Lonewolf_50 is offline  
Old 4th Apr 2011, 19:27
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Muscat, Oman
Posts: 604
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Blacksheep - to keep comparing oranges with apples: that gives the B-17 a return of $757/mph against the Fleet Destroyers $8,571/mph.
Ali Barber is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.