Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

MOD Civil Servants £300M Bonuses Vs Battle of Britain Memorial Flight's £3M.

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

MOD Civil Servants £300M Bonuses Vs Battle of Britain Memorial Flight's £3M.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 15th Jan 2010, 21:32
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: earth
Posts: 1,398
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There is already a large amount of sponsorship in the BBMF and a great deal of help from industry. Whilst further private funding could be sought it is worth remembering that we have a collective responsibility to remember all those people in this island who made the Battle of Britain our finest hour.

To forget the BBMF motto 'Lest we Forget' is to not only fail to respect all those people but also to forget the lessons of that period. Whilst it was our finest hour it was also a period in history when political failings took us very close to loss of our national identity and cultural heritage. Could we repeat such failures if we forget those lessons - you bet we could and we're not that far from doing so today.

Three million is a very small price to keep those lessons fresh.
soddim is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2010, 12:15
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: in the mess
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Agreed....
nice castle is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2010, 18:58
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: MARS
Posts: 1,104
Received 11 Likes on 5 Posts
Whilst it is easy to have a pop at the Civil Servants, without them we would be stuffed and by the way, have a look here at actually how low most of them are paid.

The comments above re- imposition of the pay bonuses are correct and on top of that, many of them have jobs that may well be taken under PACE.

Bernard Gray's recent report emphasised quite clearly that the MOD needs high quality, properly trained individuals in the civil service, particularly in DE&S, unfortunately, over the last few decades we have been paying peanuts....
Widger is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2010, 23:28
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: uk
Posts: 3,252
Received 227 Likes on 78 Posts
Bernard Gray's recent report emphasised quite clearly that the MOD needs high quality, properly trained individuals in the civil service, particularly in DE&S, unfortunately, over the last few decades we have been paying peanuts....
One of the main problems is that an organisation whose primary role is to deliver kit to time, cost and performance does not test their project managers in this competence before promotion.

Quite the opposite in fact. Show me a project manager in DE&S who has, say, 100 successful projects under his belt. A rare species indeed, yet 20 years ago such a man would be described as inexperienced if those projects did not include technologies across a raft of disciplines and in every phase of the procurement cycle (Concept to Disposal).

By contrast, many project managers have grossly inexperienced bosses who are little more than professional minutes secretaries, as they are completely devoid of original thought and relevant experience.

In short, the hierarchy is often upsidedown. Not everyone is paid peanuts - £40k is pretty good for writing minutes; but £30k is abysmal for someone holding airworthiness delegation, who does not see a promotion to minutes secretary as very inviting. They must start by placing value on the right skills and competence.

Gray was right, but Haddon-Cave may be the catalyst.
tucumseh is offline  
Old 17th Jan 2010, 00:53
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Tennessee - Smoky Mountains
Age: 55
Posts: 1,602
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Flame me, I care not, but here is the deal in my view:

1. The Battle of Britain Memorial Flight exists as a memorial to WW2 air warfare. Without which, we would be speaking German.

2. The costs of the BBMF should be borne from the public purse. The country required the services of those that are commemorated. Ergo, it should pay for their memorial.

3. If the country imposed a mere GBP 1000 charge on those immigrating to the country, such costs as the BBMF etc could be readily offset. Those that thought the charge unreasonable would be welcome to change their minds on their immigration plans.

MOD Civil Service bonuses are not part of the equation. They are our blokes too.
Roadster280 is offline  
Old 17th Jan 2010, 09:09
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 660
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A debate on the continued, and indeed the source of, £3M required for the BBMF is well worth having.

Pitting that cost against civilian MOD colleagues salaries and pay awards was nothing more than cheap trolling by VIProds who has been remarkably silent since posting his first inflamatory and confontational post. Pathetic really.
Chris Kebab is offline  
Old 17th Jan 2010, 10:19
  #27 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 83
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I am sorry you feel that way CK. I was just quoting what the "Mail" published, the figure of £3M for the BBMF looked insignificant against the MOD's £300M Bonuses. My thanks to AA & PN for pointing out the Bonuses are withheld from the pay pot, which I was not aware of, as I am sure were many others.

The only reason that I have been silent is that last week I have been ferrying my wife around Cancer Care Units & Hospitals. I even had to cancel a talk that I was to give at the North Lincs ACA, sorry Guys.
VIProds is offline  
Old 17th Jan 2010, 16:36
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: in my combat underpants
Age: 53
Posts: 1,065
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Show me a project manager in DE&S who has, say, 100 successful projects under his belt. A rare species indeed,yet 20 years ago such a man would be described as inexperienced if those projects did not include technologies across a raft of disciplines and in every phase of the procurement cycle
Did we have 100 year old Civil Servants then? I think you are over-egging that pudding just a little bit - 100 successful projects within the DE&S arena?
Mr C Hinecap is offline  
Old 17th Jan 2010, 17:55
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 660
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Fair enough VIP – the danger of sourcing information from the “Mail” I guess!
Sorry for being a tad brutal, I currently work with some MOD civvies who quietly beaver away doing a first class job on a very modest salary and who feel they have been totally pilloried by the press and certain politicians.

Problem is they are a nice soft all too easy target for the ill informed or those out to create mischief. I certainly feel that those of us in uniform (I presume you are/were - AL1, just spotted your age!) ought really to give them a break and not believe everything we read in the papers.
Chris Kebab is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2010, 13:15
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Northumberland
Age: 65
Posts: 748
Received 6 Likes on 2 Posts
Let's not forget that not all civvies work in offices. I left the RAF after 23 years as a regular and then completed 3 years as FTRS.
I am now a civilian instructor working both in a simulator and the classroom. Moreover, I am heavily involved in Course Design, standardisation and can be employed in everything from basic to advanced instruction.
For all that the RAF get my expertise, experience and continuity for about 40% of the cost of the same individual in uniform. I therefore represent a significant saving (IMHO!).
I am not saying that we cannot be replaced/axed but to do so would deprive the military of a rich source of experience and expertise.
Wyler is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2010, 15:18
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: essex
Age: 76
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Don't forget that this report came from the mail so it probably bears the same sort of similarity to the truth as a Vimy does to a Vulcan
mikip is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2010, 15:36
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: 2 m South of Radstock VRP
Posts: 2,042
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Jimlad1
The bonus system was forced on the MOD by one Mr Gordon Brown several years ago, over very strong complaints by MOD staff.
Indeed; and what is easily forgotten or overlooked is that the infernal system was foisted on the entire Civil Service. I’m not saying that they should be criticised, far from it, but it is interesting that the accusation of milking the Taxpayer is rarely levelled at CSs in the Health Service or Revenue and Customs.
GOLF_BRAVO_ZULU is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.