Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

should the RAF fly the Royals?

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

should the RAF fly the Royals?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 20th Jun 2008, 16:46
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,893
Received 348 Likes on 122 Posts
With the Luftwaffe now acquiring 2 x A340-300s and some A319LRs for VIP and ministerial duties, their 2 x very plush A310-300s currently used for VIP transport work could be up for grabs?

The interiors of those knock spots off the old 'royal' suite which used to be installed in the Vickers FunBus when it went corgi-carrying. They even have proper showers in the VIP sleeping accommodation (and yes, the shower rose does have more than 10 holes...).

Personally I think we most definitely should have a proper VVIP aircraft for Her Majesty.
BEagle is online now  
Old 20th Jun 2008, 19:17
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Transiting the M27
Age: 50
Posts: 277
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I will never forget the day six years ago I flew out of Northolt. I was hanging around for a Squirrel and in desperate need of the loo. Asked directions and ended up in the poshest Ladies I have ever visited.

Rang my dad later to say I had sat on the Queen's throne
Beatriz Fontana is offline  
Old 20th Jun 2008, 19:32
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Yorkshire
Age: 80
Posts: 429
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There's only one way for our Queen to travel by air and that's in the most up-to-date aircraft money can buy fitted out to the highest possible standard. It should be flown by members of her Royal Air Force ably assisted, of course, by members of her Royal Navy.

It goes almost without saying that free-loading come-day-go-day politicians like Brown and the rest of the Westminster snouts in trough brigade would not be allowed to borrow it.
exscribbler is offline  
Old 20th Jun 2008, 19:33
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Sitting on the toilet of Europe.... the UK
Posts: 264
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
NO

Not just the RAF.

If there were to be a Royal Sqn again, then it should be Tri Service!

i do believe when she is visiting foreign countries she should fly with the Royal Air Force as they represent our nation our flag.
The Queen is also the head of The Royal Navy and Army as well you know!
Are the other two services not able to Fly the Flag for UK PLC?
Faithless is offline  
Old 20th Jun 2008, 20:21
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Dre's mum's house
Posts: 1,432
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
TQF should be part of the Royal Household separate from the military.

The Govt should provide, and regularly replace, an Airbus A340 for long haul, a 319CJ for short haul and 2 helicopters. As far as possible only European aircraft should be used.

The crews should be civilians employed by the Royal Household, however, it should be possible to second personnel from the 3 Services to TQF as a normal tour of duty.
The Real Slim Shady is offline  
Old 20th Jun 2008, 22:01
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Yorkshire
Age: 80
Posts: 429
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thread drift?

And while you're at it, let's have a new Royal Yacht.

Might I suggest something neat but not gaudy, about 6000 tons, 22 knots, 3000 miles at 20 knots? It could be used for HM's tours, trade fairs and at a pinch might be fitted out as a hospital ship.

Come to think of it, there's one that would quite nicely fit the bill alongside at Leith...
exscribbler is offline  
Old 20th Jun 2008, 23:10
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Bury St Edmunds.
Age: 60
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Missed a 0! The new Royal Yacht will be 60,000 not 6000, will have a lovely long flat deck for corgi walks and will have the same name as HM.

Oops, 2 much Woodfords Wherry.....time for bed....
Guzlin Adnams is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2008, 01:12
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: London/Oxford/New York
Posts: 2,929
Received 141 Likes on 66 Posts
For goodness sake. She is one of the richest women on the planet and belongs to one of the richest families.

If she wants to fly around in a posh biz jet let her buy one and run it herself.
pr00ne is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2008, 07:00
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 1,089
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Does anyone know why this decision has been made - is it on the grounds of cost alone"

Simple - politics of envy, it's what drives many politicians especially labour ones.
WorkingHard is offline  
Old 22nd Jun 2008, 00:01
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
OK.. so maybe we should ask it in a different way...............

SHOULD A PILOT WHO HOLDS NO NATIONAL LICENCE FLY THE QUEEN?...


If the RAF are so good then why do they need to get a licence when they get out????
helmut-weisserkuvver is offline  
Old 22nd Jun 2008, 07:41
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: France 46
Age: 77
Posts: 1,743
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
h-w

Because that nice Mr Brown needs all the pennies he can get his hands on.
cazatou is offline  
Old 23rd Jun 2008, 08:14
  #32 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: beaconsfield
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for your opinions so far. Does anyone know what the new aircraft will be that the Royal Household will be purchasing? The Transport Minister announced in March that a small aircraft will be procured for UK travel.
luxurydave is offline  
Old 23rd Jun 2008, 09:27
  #33 (permalink)  

FX Guru
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Greenwich
Age: 67
Posts: 900
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If it's a 146 Charlie will be able to fly it thus saving the taxpayer the expense of a man with a big watch in the LHS.

But maybe not around Scottish islands.....
angels is offline  
Old 23rd Jun 2008, 10:14
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: England
Posts: 1,930
Received 7 Likes on 4 Posts
Helmut

Great post for your first one (I wish we had a smilie with a fishing rod)

If the RAF are so good then why do they need to get a licence when they get out????
Because it's an civil aviation requirement?!?!?
Roland Pulfrew is offline  
Old 23rd Jun 2008, 14:08
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Flight Ops Dept
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not just the RAF.

If there were to be a Royal Sqn again, then it should be Tri Service!

Quote:
i do believe when she is visiting foreign countries she should fly with the Royal Air Force as they represent our nation our flag.
The Queen is also the head of The Royal Navy and Army as well you know!
Are the other two services not able to Fly the Flag for UK PLC?
If she goes by Sea then the Navy can take her, RAF =Royal Air Force (yes i know the AAC & FAA fly) FAA is fleet air arm nothing royal in that or AAC!!
blue monday is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.