Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Why Are The Tucanos Knackered?

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Why Are The Tucanos Knackered?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 25th Sep 2007, 00:28
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Blighty
Posts: 4,789
Received 8 Likes on 4 Posts
IIRC, flight test on a Kenyan aircraft, a drop tank was released, it hit the tailplane which came off. Successful ejection, but pilot couldn't get into dingy and died of hypothermia. It was winter and he wasn't wearing an immersion suit.
Dan Winterland is offline  
Old 25th Sep 2007, 17:09
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Puken
Posts: 358
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I was led to believe the testing team were investigating flutter on the control surfaces when it got all out of hand and the a/c broke up.

Also I believe the TP forgot to fasten the PSP connector which ultimately led to his sad downfall.
Farfrompuken is offline  
Old 28th Sep 2007, 22:45
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: North
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Misinformation

The thread seems to have drifted a bit from Tucanos to Hawks and PC9s.
Just to put the record straight with facts, Mr Prescott was never the MP for Brough, his constituency is East Hull.
Saudi PC9s don't have a glass cockpits
And if you pilot people wanted to fly stick and rudder machines then you should perhaps train on them. As far as I can see the Typhoon stick and rudder is connected to a computer and when that fails your stick and rudder skills count for nowt.
Perhaps the Tucano should have been a PC9! But that is just my opinion.
x10ge is offline  
Old 29th Sep 2007, 01:21
  #44 (permalink)  
lgw
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
With MFTS does anyone know what the end date for the Tucano?
lgw is offline  
Old 30th Sep 2007, 00:03
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: uk
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And if you pilot people wanted to fly stick and rudder machines then you should perhaps train on them. As far as I can see the Typhoon stick and rudder is connected to a computer and when that fails your stick and rudder skills count for nowt.
And I suppose all Airbus drivers have never driven a light fixed wing, engineers have never held a spanner and Lewis Hamilton has never driven a car with a stick shift.

Insightful, thanks.
rudekid is offline  
Old 1st Oct 2007, 17:13
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: In a bush, a very bushy bush
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Oops Sorry

x10ge, thanks for the education, but Brough/East Hull doesnt really matter but it was the same fat man that lobbied parliament and hey presto, Hawk 128 forced on unsuspecting RAF.

Thread has gone from Tucano, Hawk and PC 9 because the 1st 2 aircraft happen to be in the RAF fast jet training system and the PC 9 could have been.

As for stick and rudder, Pilots are still learning stick and rudder techniques because every fast jet in the RAF has a stick and rudder of some sort regardless of how many computers are between pilot input and control surface output. RAF pilots are taught to fly each aircraft to it's performance limit whether those limits are imposed by computers or FRCs. The PC9 the RAF might have bought would have faced the same problem that the Tincan faces now, which is why so many airforces who have older PC9s are looking for an upgrade/replacement.

PumpCockMixMags is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2007, 15:23
  #47 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: [loh-key-shuhn] 1. a place of settlement, activity, or residence 2. a place or situation occupied
Age: 52
Posts: 238
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sorry, but the *build* of the Tucano is utter Sh1t3. If you look at the underside there's about a million vents, seams and fasteners all over the shop. Kinda like the way I wrap Xmas prezzies - nice and tidy on the top but a dogs dinner underneath. If Shorts had built a PC9 under license I'm sure it'd be in the same boat...
MostlyHarmless is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2007, 17:06
  #48 (permalink)  
AR1
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Nottinghamshire
Age: 63
Posts: 710
Received 4 Likes on 1 Post
Tucano replacement will be the new Hawk2020 - Turboprop Hawk derivative with low carbon engine. High efficiency photo voltaic cells embedded in the upper wing panels will power the cockpit electrics.

Word is that the initial build wont be cleared for inverted flight.;-)
AR1 is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2007, 18:57
  #49 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: England
Posts: 1,930
Received 7 Likes on 4 Posts
lgw

With MFTS does anyone know what the end date for the Tucano?
Don't expect anything much before 2014. And that assumes that PR08 doesn't hit with more "savings" measures!!
Roland Pulfrew is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.