Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Hawk at 30

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 13th Jun 2007, 11:38
  #1 (permalink)  
AR1
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Nottinghamshire
Age: 63
Posts: 710
Received 4 Likes on 1 Post
Hawk at 30

Unless I'm mistaken, the Hawk is 30 years in service this year. Given that equates (in simple terms) to the RAF in 1977 using an aircraft from 1947! - is there a replacement on the horizon, if so, what?
AR1 is offline  
Old 13th Jun 2007, 11:43
  #2 (permalink)  
Red On, Green On
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Between the woods and the water
Age: 24
Posts: 6,487
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
The Chipmunk served from 1950 to 1996 all told, though for the last twenty or so years it was just on AEF duty.
airborne_artist is offline  
Old 13th Jun 2007, 11:44
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Temporarily missing from the Joe Louis Arena
Posts: 2,133
Received 28 Likes on 17 Posts
Unless I'm mistaken, the Hawk is 30 years in service this year. Given that equates (in simple terms) to the RAF in 1977 using an aircraft from 1947! - is there a replacement on the horizon, if so, what?
Thats a very simplistic view to say the least.

Quality of build and the ability to 'futureproof' designs were completely different in 1947 to they were in 1977.

But to answer your question, I believe 24 new Hawks have been ordered and will be with the RAF some time in the future.
The Helpful Stacker is offline  
Old 13th Jun 2007, 15:15
  #4 (permalink)  
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,264
Received 180 Likes on 106 Posts
Indeed, the mighty Hawk 128 (or AJT or whatever you want to call it) should be arriving late 08/early 09 with the first students progressing through courses in '10 or '11. More power, more fuel, combat wing, advanced avionics and more toys than you can shake a stick at. (Ok so it might not be the ideal solution, but it ain't half bad!)
PPRuNeUser0211 is offline  
Old 13th Jun 2007, 15:25
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: The front end and about 50ft up
Posts: 510
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Plenty of aircraft have served beyond 30 years. It's not unusual. Age of a design alone is certainly not an indicator of usefulness: just look at the Dakotas that still earn money in various parts of the world. The Hunter was in squadron service for over 40 years and the Canberra, I believe, 50. Properly supported, funded and maintained, any aircraft can last practically forever. If it's a good design and does it's job well, that's no bad thing.

I heard somewhere that when they reach their forecast out of service dates, some lumps of B-52 and Nimrod, will have been serving for the best part of 100 years (although perhaps in the same manner as my grandfather's broom).

Incidentally, didn't the RAF recently have to lease back the Canberras that they had just auctioned off, because nothing else available in the inventory could do the job of the Canberra - a late 1940s design.
Fg Off Max Stout is offline  
Old 13th Jun 2007, 15:37
  #6 (permalink)  
AR1
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Nottinghamshire
Age: 63
Posts: 710
Received 4 Likes on 1 Post
Thanks for your responses. I am aware I was being a little simplistic, but when you see those buggers being thrown around, it does make one think of airframe longevity.

Great aircraft from a standing on the ground perspective, looks good in flight, and carves throught the turns 'with the greatest of ease'

My goal in '78 was to be a FLEM (Might as well set those sights high!) and work on them at Valley with my mate, but I got siphoned off into a higher pay band. Oh well, never mind...
AR1 is offline  
Old 13th Jun 2007, 20:49
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 310
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
pba is right!

Just short of 30 Hawk 128 AJT a/c are under production. What does this mean? Well, a better airframe (Wing, Combat Flap, wingtip Mx), A Bigger Motor (Adour 951... 20% more 'Go'), Modern systems ie: TCAS, Auto Pilot, Glass Cockpit, Fully Integrated Nav / Ins / GPS system, HOTAS, HUD, Ground Attack training capabillity, A-A training capability. But, this is only the start...... This replaces the T1a in the Tac Wpns role, but future and further enhancements 'may' include: Synthetic (DataLinked) Radar, Synthetic Ground Environments (SAMS), Virtual Air Environments, and many other possible concepts.

The 'Basic' model, makes a T1 look like a museum piece. The 'End Game', should be worthy of the JSF generation.

'Hawk', was a winner in 1977, and as a training tool, it still is. A Good a/c remains a good a/c (OK the T1s are Knacked). Update, modernise and enhance.... you have a winner. Simple. Stick with the winning formula.

Advo
advocatusDIABOLI is offline  
Old 13th Jun 2007, 21:00
  #8 (permalink)  
oik
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Chipmunkery?

http://www.bbmf.co.uk/othertypes.html
Scroll down.
oik is offline  
Old 13th Jun 2007, 21:58
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: East Anglia
Posts: 1,873
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A Good a/c remains a good a/c (OK the T1s are Knacked). Update, modernise and enhance.... you have a winner
If only 30 are on order to replace I'd guess 80? currently in service I guess the new stock will get knackered a lot more quickly. Obviously someone thinks we won't need the throughput of trainee pilots.
Kitbag is offline  
Old 13th Jun 2007, 22:20
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Home
Posts: 62
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
All this praise being levelled at T'bungling Barron's toy........ Beagle, where art thou?
WasNaeMe is offline  
Old 13th Jun 2007, 22:36
  #11 (permalink)  
6Z3
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: God's Country
Posts: 647
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
We're getting Hawk 128 because the govt said so. And the govt said so because BAE said so. Questions?
6Z3 is offline  
Old 13th Jun 2007, 22:51
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 310
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Kitbag,

If these threads are read and taken as the 'Truth', we won't need any 128's.


(I won't need one!, neither will 'Beagle' I suspect?)

Fact is, That's What's Comming. And Actually, it's a really good a/c. Plane and simple.

Advo
advocatusDIABOLI is offline  
Old 13th Jun 2007, 23:02
  #13 (permalink)  
Green Flash
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Allright, here goes (says 4 most excellent pints of St Magnus!!!!) - so what's the longest lived cab still being used by Aunty Betty? BBMF et al not allowed. Me know nuthin but i'll open with the Andover. Takers?
 
Old 14th Jun 2007, 11:58
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: East Anglia
Posts: 1,873
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Advo I was not having a go at the aircraft, rather the decision to replace the training fleet with less than half their number. The T1 is undoubtedly a fine aircraft, especially if it can be sold to the Americans in competition with their own indigenous designs, just concerned that the 128 fleet are going to rack up the hours rather faster than the T1 fleet have over the last 30 years. Mind you all the fancy av kit might help to keep it on the ground.
Kitbag is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2007, 12:45
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Temporarily missing from the Joe Louis Arena
Posts: 2,133
Received 28 Likes on 17 Posts
so what's the longest lived cab still being used by Aunty Betty? BBMF et al not allowed. Me know nuthin but i'll open with the Andover. Takers?
Isn't the Meteor used by Martin Baker still officially on loan to them and thus still on the military register?
The Helpful Stacker is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2007, 14:14
  #16 (permalink)  
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,264
Received 180 Likes on 106 Posts
Kitbag,

bear in mind that we now train approximately 2 fast jet pilots a year, vs the hundred or so in the 70s. So hours will build at a similar rate I should imagine....
PPRuNeUser0211 is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2007, 14:18
  #17 (permalink)  
Red On, Green On
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Between the woods and the water
Age: 24
Posts: 6,487
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Isn't the Meteor used by Martin Baker still officially on loan to them and thus still on the military register?
They have two, WL419 and WA638.
airborne_artist is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2007, 16:03
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Wiltshire, UK
Age: 62
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Haven't QinetiQ still got a couple of Havards flying? (not the Raytheon variety)

MDLB
My Dad's Little Boy is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2007, 17:10
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: N51 09".94 W001 45".51
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
oldest

There is still a harvard flying at boscombe down. Been in Raf service since 1940 i think and still works today for photo chase and the like
billynospares is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2007, 17:13
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: N51 09".94 W001 45".51
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
oldest 2

Also isnt the mighty hercules 40 years in RAF service this year ?
billynospares is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.