New images of CVF FR (PA2)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: western europe
Posts: 1,367
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Of course if all goes $$$$$ up .....
it can present one with a problem ....
http://www.jethros.i12.com/fun/fun_pages/oh_poo.htm
it can present one with a problem ....
![Boo Hoo](https://www.pprune.org/images/smilies/boohoo.gif)
http://www.jethros.i12.com/fun/fun_pages/oh_poo.htm
Avoid imitations
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,634
Received 513 Likes
on
273 Posts
Registered User **
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: LONDON
Posts: 372
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
natural surface and possibly the subsurface melting are not
singularly,and I don't say that lightly, attributable to the local ambient temperature.
You must understand that the potential for melting is a complex
combination of the angle of inclination of incoming
radiation
![Uh oh](https://www.pprune.org/images/smilies/worry.gif)
temperature), the amount of reflected
radiation
![Cool](https://www.pprune.org/images/smilies/cool.gif)
the absorption and transmission of the
nonreflected radiation. Or when the sun comes up it gets hot and the ice melts.
Or put another way Q Q e x sw,x sw,a = -m
where Qsw,x = flux of shortwave solar radiation
![Bad teeth](https://www.pprune.org/images/smilies/badteeth.gif)
at depth x in the snowpack,
Qsw,a = flux of shortwave solar radiation
![Bored](https://www.pprune.org/images/smilies/wbored.gif)
absorbed at the snow surface,
m = bulk extinction coefficient.
![Nerd](https://www.pprune.org/images/smilies/nerd.gif)