Indian MiG 25s
Resident insomniac
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: N54 58 34 W02 01 21
Age: 79
Posts: 1,873
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Indian MiG 25s
The Indian Air Force (IAF) has announced it will retire its fleet of MiG 25s, Cold War-era spyplanes, previously shrouded in secrecy.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/south_asia/4892524.stm
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/south_asia/4892524.stm
![G-CPTN is offline](https://www.pprune.org/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
TheVillagePhotographer.co.uk
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Cotswolds UK
Posts: 1,078
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The MiGs, capable of flying at over three times the speed of sound, were bought from the USSR in 1981.
"It will be a nostalgic event and a flypast will be held," Air Vice Marshal S Mukherjee said.
"It will be a nostalgic event and a flypast will be held," Air Vice Marshal S Mukherjee said.
Conan
![Conan the Librarian is offline](https://www.pprune.org/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 887
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have always doubted that this barge could do M3.0 and I still wait to be convinced.
Quoting from the article: 'The Pentagon's misplaced belief that the MiG was a highly-agile dogfighter spurred the development of the US F-15 and F-16 fighters.'
Misplaced belief, eh? Contrived figures, more likely. The Pentagon were masters of manipulating and enhancing Soviet aircraft performance figures to bolster their own various programmes long before the Soviet aircraft had even flown, and fair play to them for that. Just look, for example, at how the performance assessments for the Backfire were progressively reduced. But at least this has meant that they have been able to keep their Air Force up-to-date.
Quoting from the article: 'The Pentagon's misplaced belief that the MiG was a highly-agile dogfighter spurred the development of the US F-15 and F-16 fighters.'
Misplaced belief, eh? Contrived figures, more likely. The Pentagon were masters of manipulating and enhancing Soviet aircraft performance figures to bolster their own various programmes long before the Soviet aircraft had even flown, and fair play to them for that. Just look, for example, at how the performance assessments for the Backfire were progressively reduced. But at least this has meant that they have been able to keep their Air Force up-to-date.
![Zoom is offline](https://www.pprune.org/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
TheVillagePhotographer.co.uk
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Cotswolds UK
Posts: 1,078
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From what I have read, 2.8 was a good, average and preferred speed for the clean Foxy. It was clocked at over 3.2 in recon guise, (Over Sinai, Yom Kippur days) though it was found later that the engines had been effectively wrecked in getting there. Allegedly....
Conan
Conan
![Conan the Librarian is offline](https://www.pprune.org/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
There must be some reason that the IAF squad operating the 'bat was called the Trisonics, right? ![Smilie](https://www.pprune.org/images/smilies/smile.gif)
And I've read frequently enough that thought they could exceed Mach 3, they only did so when they had no other choice because at the end of the flight, the engines had to be removed and completely overhauled because the RAM effect on the turbine...
Still, I love the Foxbat... a very "raw" design. Sad to see them go.
Oh well, bring in the boring satellites....
![Smilie](https://www.pprune.org/images/smilies/smile.gif)
And I've read frequently enough that thought they could exceed Mach 3, they only did so when they had no other choice because at the end of the flight, the engines had to be removed and completely overhauled because the RAM effect on the turbine...
Still, I love the Foxbat... a very "raw" design. Sad to see them go.
Oh well, bring in the boring satellites....
![Roll Eyes (Sarcastic)](https://www.pprune.org/images/smilies2/icon_rolleyes.gif)
![BombayDuck is offline](https://www.pprune.org/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
Spoke recently to an Eagle pilot who'd CAPd the KAL 747 shot down north of Japan in 1984. He said that they had tracked a Foxbat at 3.2, and that they believed it was carrying a war loadout of missiles at the time.
![Ewan Whosearmy is offline](https://www.pprune.org/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: preston
Age: 76
Posts: 376
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
There was a book ( Mig Pilot) supposedly written by Lt Victor Belenko, who defected to Japan around 1975. He stated that the safe maximum was 2.8. Anything faster you riked engine meltdown.
![dalek is offline](https://www.pprune.org/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Great Southern Land
Age: 57
Posts: 434
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
MiG PILOT by John Barron. McGraw-Hill, ISBN 0-07-003850-3
Looking at my copy as I write this.
I know a bloke who knows Victor .... I believe he lives in Alaska, and he's on the level. He isn't a creation of the CIA Military-Industrial complex imperialist running dog enemies of the Rodina.
Looking at my copy as I write this.
I know a bloke who knows Victor .... I believe he lives in Alaska, and he's on the level. He isn't a creation of the CIA Military-Industrial complex imperialist running dog enemies of the Rodina.
![Like This - Do That is offline](https://www.pprune.org/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)