Question for Submarine hunters
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: zz plural 5
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Question for Submarine hunters
I see in the "Sun" newspaper that the Royal Navy are to repaint their submarines blue.Do you think this will make them harder to spot from the air?There is a competition by the way,If you see one send an e-mail to [email protected].
I don't know what the prize is,200litres of now surplus black paint?
I don't know what the prize is,200litres of now surplus black paint?
![Bad teeth](https://www.pprune.org/images/smilies/badteeth.gif)
![cornwallis is offline](https://www.pprune.org/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
Wow....scared me there for a minute....was afraid you would say "pink" or "mauve" or some pastel hue.
![SASless is offline](https://www.pprune.org/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
Suspicion breeds confidence
Ah, well we did have a pink submarine not all that long ago. I think it was HMS Porpoise. It was determined (then) that it was not the ideal colour. Mid 80s if I remember. Jack did not like the idea of serving on a pink sub. Dunno why.
Last edited by Navaleye; 22nd Mar 2006 at 00:02.
![Navaleye is offline](https://www.pprune.org/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
I suspect its the cuts and overstretch that have made them blue.
This so called story is also reported on the RN website: Here
I seem to recall similar experiments a few years ago. All part of the move to operations in the littoral. Pity the surface fleet will have problems with littoral operations due to losing* organic air defence - see the Sea Jet thread.
*Also cuts across the fleet, cuts to future projects and programmes, delays in procurement of new equipment, delays to CVF, reduced spending on helicopters, keeping much of the fleet at a lower state of readiness, cutting the training budget etc etc etc.
![EEK!](https://www.pprune.org/images/smilies/eek.gif)
![EEK!](https://www.pprune.org/images/smilies/eek.gif)
This so called story is also reported on the RN website: Here
I seem to recall similar experiments a few years ago. All part of the move to operations in the littoral. Pity the surface fleet will have problems with littoral operations due to losing* organic air defence - see the Sea Jet thread.
*Also cuts across the fleet, cuts to future projects and programmes, delays in procurement of new equipment, delays to CVF, reduced spending on helicopters, keeping much of the fleet at a lower state of readiness, cutting the training budget etc etc etc.
![WE Branch Fanatic is online now](https://www.pprune.org/images/statusicon/user_online.gif)
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Temporarily missing from the Joe Louis Arena
Posts: 2,133
Received 28 Likes
on
17 Posts
![](http://www.airtoaircombat.com/images/seaharrier_lg.jpg)
"For Sale, FA2 Sea Harrier. Little use since 1982, one careful owner, sold as seen. Lack of use and spiralling costs force sale. Much loved by air shows and matlots with one foot still firmly in the past."
![The Helpful Stacker is offline](https://www.pprune.org/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
Gentleman Aviator
cornwallis mon brave, you could post a thread on ethnic macrame work in the Gobi Desert and WEBFoot would find a SHAR connexion.....
![Boo Hoo](https://www.pprune.org/images/smilies/boohoo.gif)
![teeteringhead is offline](https://www.pprune.org/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 383
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The littoral theatre?
We need SSKs for littoral ops. SSNs are too big and noisy to be effective in close-quarter ops. Losing our SSKs meant we lost our ability to deploy subs at the tactical level close to shore, and this was supposed to be mitigated by the use of Tomahawk. I don't think they were too bothered about what colour the subs were.
We need SSKs for littoral ops. SSNs are too big and noisy to be effective in close-quarter ops. Losing our SSKs meant we lost our ability to deploy subs at the tactical level close to shore, and this was supposed to be mitigated by the use of Tomahawk. I don't think they were too bothered about what colour the subs were.
![tablet_eraser is offline](https://www.pprune.org/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
Originally Posted by cornwallis
Oh no I have created another sea-jet forum.........Have any of you flown a nimrod ,P3,or IL38 looking for submarines?
![Roland Pulfrew is offline](https://www.pprune.org/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: zz plural 5
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Roland Pulfrew,back to the original question,do you think that you would spot a submerged submarine in shallow water if it was painted blue?I hear that pink is the trial colour for the far east
![cornwallis is offline](https://www.pprune.org/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
Seen many a submarine in various states of submergence and can testify as too how hard they are to spot(VERY). Our Israeli friends have been using funky colour schemes for donkey's. I am sure I have seen a photo of the Dolphin submerged and will try to hoke it out and post it for your inspection
![Thumb](https://www.pprune.org/images/smilies/thumbs.gif)
![Thumb](https://www.pprune.org/images/smilies/thumbs.gif)
![](http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/world/israel/images/dolphin_subp_idf-navy3out.jpg)
![akula is offline](https://www.pprune.org/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
I had a nice piccy of a submarine underwater in the North Sea. Don't know about colour though as it was a black and white picture.
Despite it being 30 years ago there are certain things that might be true today so sorry, I can't say whose submarine, what type, what colour or what we saw. I can say however it was submerged, conventional and near devil's hole.
Despite it being 30 years ago there are certain things that might be true today so sorry, I can't say whose submarine, what type, what colour or what we saw. I can say however it was submerged, conventional and near devil's hole.
![Pontius Navigator is offline](https://www.pprune.org/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Scotland
Posts: 425
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Navaleye,
If the enemy is being silly then they should pose us no threat!!!
I mean sticking there fingers in their ears and going “la la la la la la we cannot hear you” is not where we should have subs anyway.
What we have to worry about is when they are being nasty
Like poking people in the eyes or giving out wedgies!!!
Cheers
BHR
If the enemy is being silly then they should pose us no threat!!!
![EEK!](https://www.pprune.org/images/smilies/eek.gif)
![EEK!](https://www.pprune.org/images/smilies/eek.gif)
![EEK!](https://www.pprune.org/images/smilies/eek.gif)
I mean sticking there fingers in their ears and going “la la la la la la we cannot hear you” is not where we should have subs anyway.
What we have to worry about is when they are being nasty
![Ouch](https://www.pprune.org/images/smilies/shiner.gif)
![Ouch](https://www.pprune.org/images/smilies/shiner.gif)
![Ouch](https://www.pprune.org/images/smilies/shiner.gif)
Like poking people in the eyes or giving out wedgies!!!
Cheers
BHR
![BillHicksRules is offline](https://www.pprune.org/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: northside
Posts: 472
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If the enemy are being silly then why not send in the Air Force or a bunch of soldiers.... Whats a submarine gonna bring to the party? Torpedoes...?
Nah, there is a very good reason the RN doesn't operate any SSK's...... we don't need em.
Nah, there is a very good reason the RN doesn't operate any SSK's...... we don't need em.
![southside is offline](https://www.pprune.org/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)