Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

BAE to assemble UK JSF's?

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

BAE to assemble UK JSF's?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 4th Sep 2003, 22:24
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Back in Blighty...
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BAE to assemble UK JSF's?

Should prompt some discussion

Click here.
emitex is offline  
Old 4th Sep 2003, 22:36
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Hendon
Posts: 260
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A proper job?

gimme gimme gimme!
noisy is offline  
Old 4th Sep 2003, 23:02
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 461
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That should ensure that the a/c enters service well behind schedule!
WASALOADIE is offline  
Old 4th Sep 2003, 23:20
  #4 (permalink)  
Suspicion breeds confidence
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Gibraltar
Posts: 2,406
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 4 Posts
Errors

Actually no JSFs have been ordered. The govt has just selected it with an expectation that up 150 will be ordered.

It does raise one interesting question. The reason the govt selected the STOVL version was because of a two year ISD delay by procuring the CV variant. If BAe opens up another production line then this reason may no longer exist.

Comments?
Navaleye is offline  
Old 4th Sep 2003, 23:38
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Back in Blighty...
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The reason the govt selected the STOVL version was because of a two year ISD delay by procuring the CV variant. If BAe opens up another production line then this reason may no longer exist.
Of course! - end up with a better version of the kite AND a shed load of jobs!

Now, what about those ships...
emitex is offline  
Old 4th Sep 2003, 23:53
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: NEAR TO ISK
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The best bit in the article is at the bottom,
Bae have being working on a "STEALTH FIGHTER" code name "REPLICA".

Must be the Nimrod replacement then
bluetail is offline  
Old 5th Sep 2003, 00:16
  #7 (permalink)  
Suspicion breeds confidence
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Gibraltar
Posts: 2,406
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 4 Posts
It fails mention

That this has little to do with Pres. Blair but its Uncle Sam's decision if they will let us build them here. Why would they?
Navaleye is offline  
Old 5th Sep 2003, 01:41
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: these mist covered mountains are a home now for me.
Posts: 1,787
Received 30 Likes on 13 Posts
Why would they?

It's all to do with contracts and the like. The UK could afford to buy more (and risk share in the development) if they can build them under licence in the UK.

Look at Australia. They licence build F/A-18s, PC-9s, Blackhawks and more. Hundreds of contractors are involved, and the spin-offs include a technology gain. Some of Australia's mods have even made it back to the USA, which must be a money earner. I say that there should be more of it. Partnerships with some of the world's best and largest aerospace companies can only do more with the limited Defence Pounds.....
Runaway Gun is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.