Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > Medical & Health
Reload this Page >

Youngest Age for New Borns to Fly

Wikiposts
Search
Medical & Health News and debate about medical and health issues as they relate to aircrews and aviation. Any information gleaned from this forum MUST be backed up by consulting your state-registered health professional or AME. Due to advertising legislation in various jurisdictions, endorsements of individual practitioners is not permitted.

Youngest Age for New Borns to Fly

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 22nd Nov 2001, 16:14
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: London
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post Youngest Age for New Borns to Fly

Any advice on what is the youngest reasonable age for a baby to fly in a no-pressurised GA aircraft at? Any other issues to consider such as noise, best safety practice, etc?
dakota_pete is offline  
Old 22nd Nov 2001, 18:26
  #2 (permalink)  
New Bloke
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Hi Pete,

Have a look in the Private Pilots Forum this comes up from time to time.

The general consensus in Non Pressurised GA aircraft is about 2YO as a minimum. My Kids are 4 and 2 and have yet to experience Daddy's cool talents.

In Pressurised Aircraft there was a study that linked flying with Cot Death. I don't know if any other work has been done on this.
 
Old 22nd Nov 2001, 18:42
  #3 (permalink)  
Conky Joe
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Anne Diamond launched the investigation into air travel as a cause of cot death as she had travelled with her eight month old son Sebastian in the week before his death. Medical opinion is still divided on the exact causes of cot death and the parameters are vast - I don't believe that air travel has yet been proved to be a more prominent cause than any other link.

Umm - that doesn't help with the question does it!
 
Old 22nd Nov 2001, 23:29
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

My kids started flying from 1 week old and have suffered no harmfull efects. Care is needed to ensure they can clear their ears, drinking from a bottle is a good way during pressure changes, ie climb and descent.
Loadshifta is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2001, 23:48
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking

BE VERY AWARE!!!!!!!!!!

I started flying when I was one!! Apparently i was a very good flyer and my parents always boasted about the fact to their friends. However they stopped laughing when I asked them for £60000 to pursue my passion!!!!.

Topper187 is offline  
Old 24th Nov 2001, 06:24
  #6 (permalink)  
Person Of Interest
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Keystone Heights, Florida
Age: 68
Posts: 842
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

My 2 kids were born in Latvia. Each one was restricted by the Latvian medical authorities from flying before their 1 month birthday.

My oldest son (3 yrs old) has been across the Atlantic 13 times (one way) and my youngest (1 year old Dec 4th) 3 times.

So far no ill effects but mom fears they will end up just like dad...horrors abound!!!
DownIn3Green is offline  
Old 24th Nov 2001, 10:29
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: The Burrow, N53:48:02 W1:48:57, The Tin Tent - EGBS, EGBO
Posts: 2,297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

We have flown very sick babies only hours old, by helicopter, to other hospitals where more specialist treatment was available so far without mishap. KEMH in Perth flies babies with cardiac malformations to Melbourne but this is in pressurised aircraft. Use a baby car seat if at all possible and this is best used in the recline position as it causes less restriction of movement of the diaphragm. Use a dummy for the baby to suck then the risk of inhalation of milk/water etc is reduced. Hope this helps.
PS Why not ask the airline or even the aircraft manufacturer what they recommend?
DX Wombat is offline  
Old 24th Nov 2001, 13:33
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 929
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Years ago! a now defunct major carrier used to tell the cabin crew that babes under six months old may not survive a rapid decompression. I guess modern medical opinion may differ, but I bet the jury is still out.

[ 27 November 2001: Message edited by: IcePack ]
IcePack is offline  
Old 28th Nov 2001, 00:24
  #9 (permalink)  

Plastic PPRuNer
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Cape Town
Posts: 1,898
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Arrow

Normal full-term neonates are surprisingly tough (remember, they are designed to survive the stresses of labour and delivery). The foetus has mostly haemoglobin F which is specifically designed to extract oxygen efficiently at low partial pressures [after birth it is gradually replaced by haemoglobin A(dult)]. Also, the middle ear is not pneumatised at birth so ear problems should be minimal. I'm not an expert, but on purely physiological grounds a neonate is probably better equipped to survive a rapid decompression than you are.
Mac the Knife is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.