Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Wannabes Forums > Interviews, jobs & sponsorship
Reload this Page >

lines on the earth contradiction??

Wikiposts
Search
Interviews, jobs & sponsorship The forum where interviews, job offers and selection criteria can be discussed and exchanged.

lines on the earth contradiction??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 8th Jun 2004, 20:43
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Bristol
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
lines on the earth contradiction??

Hi everyone.
Just wondering if somebody could explain to me how the equator and meridians can be both rhumb lines and great circles,as i'm sure most of you will know that rhumb lines have a constant track direction and great cirles have a constantly changing track direction.This would seem like a contradiction?I would guess the answer is reasonably straightforward,but would be most grateful if anyone can fill me in?!
Thanks.
ramshorn is offline  
Old 8th Jun 2004, 20:56
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Bristol, England
Age: 65
Posts: 1,808
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A better definition would be that rhumb lines have a constant true track direction whereas great circles are the shortest distance between two points and USUALLY have a changing track direction. The exceptions are, as you say, the equator and meridians. As an example, the shortest distance between A (51°N 000°W) and B (46°N 000°W) is along the greenwich meridian, and therefore a great circle, but has a constant track direction of 180°T and is therefore also a rhumb line.
Alex Whittingham is offline  
Old 8th Jun 2004, 22:00
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1998
Location: West Wales
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The definition of a rhumb line is that it is a regularly curved line which cuts all meridians at a constant angle. It is something of an anachronism in an age where computerised navigation systems can make the constant small changes required to keep a vehicle on the most efficient path between two points - the great circle. However, in past times navigators on water and in the air needed a line crossing meridians at a constant angle for ease of application and it was for this reason that the rhumb line was introduced. As an example, sailing ships needed to sail a sequence of straight lines to optimise wind usage. It was also the best system for use on a Mercator projection, where a straight line is a rhumb line.

To answer the original question, meridians and the equator are the only Great Cirles to also be rhumb lines as they are the limiting cases covered by the definition, i.e. the meridians cross themselves effectively at zero angle and the equator at 90 degrees.

confundemus
Pirate is offline  
Old 9th Jun 2004, 11:21
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Bristol
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thankyou both very much for your help.Got a bonus history lesson thrown in too!Always interesting.Back to the studys.
Cheers

Hi again guys!
Still on the same subject,the example given in alex\'s reply is on the greenwich meridian.Is it the case that not all meridians of longitude are rhumb lines aswell as great circles.just the greenwich meridian and antimeridian?
Hope i,m not stating the obvious?
ramshorn is offline  
Old 9th Jun 2004, 11:49
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: N/A
Posts: 161
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
All meridians are great circles.

All meridians are rhumb lines as they have a constant direction i.e. 0 degrees
parris50 is offline  
Old 9th Jun 2004, 12:05
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1998
Location: West Wales
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The thing to remember is that the equator is a geographical fact - there is, and can be, only one equator. Meridians, on the other hand are man-made conveniences for navigation and as such there can be an infinite number since any straight line joining the poles is a meridian. All are rhumb lines, since they are all crossing meridians (themselves) at zero angle.

confundemus
Pirate is offline  
Old 9th Jun 2004, 17:17
  #7 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Bristol
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks guys/gals
All cleared up!
ramshorn is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.