Wikiposts
Search
Flying Instructors & Examiners A place for instructors to communicate with one another because some of them get a bit tired of the attitude that instructing is the lowest form of aviation, as seems to prevail on some of the other forums!

Bernoulli or Coanda

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 20th Apr 2003, 21:27
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UK.
Posts: 4,390
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Question Bernoulli or Coanda

Who gets the blame in subsonic lift lectures these days; Bernoulli or Coanda?
(also asked mil forum)
Basil is offline  
Old 21st Apr 2003, 17:56
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Somewhere in Europe
Age: 53
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The coanda effect is the explanation offered in Microsoft encarta encyclopedia. Allegedly, they get their information from the boeing company.

Every other reference, school or flying club will tell you that bernoulli's theory is the principle for lift.

Unless you are an aircraft engineer designing a new type of wing, does it really matter? Years of classroom teaching supporting the latter method has produced perfectly good pilots. Any other theories might just confuse bloggs at this early stage.
flying jocks is offline  
Old 22nd Apr 2003, 02:24
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Canberra, ACT
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Newton

Action & reaction. Action: deflection of airflow. Reaction = Lift.

Bernoulli merely gives a hand to this process by causing low pressure on top of wing assisting in the more efficient deflection of airflow.

A lifing body can produce lift - without the asssitance of Bernoulli.
Blue Heeler is offline  
Old 24th Apr 2003, 18:40
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 889
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Interesting one.

My two cents worth:

Bernoulli - Based on conservation of energy. Quantitatively simple & therefore easy to understand at a basic level. Leads to Lift = 1/2 rho x v squared, which is extremely important later on. Is not particularly accurate - eg cannot handle lift from a flat plate.

Coanda - Based on conservation of momentum. More universally applicable and easier to demonstrate (spoon under running water) than Bernoulli. Unlike Bernoulli, Coanda does explain skin friction & form drag. However, leads to mathematical complexities if the student asks "how much lift is generated?"

What about Newton's laws and Kutta - Joukowski theorem, also known as circulation theory? It's all too mathematical for my poor tired brain...

I use Bernoulli because
a) I can answer the question "how much lift at airspeed X?" and
b) it doesn't need much maths.

But then I also add to my briefs "this is just a simplification - the real world is much more complicated."

regards to all,
O8
Oktas8 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.