Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Flying Instructors & Examiners
Reload this Page >

The teaching of (or absence of) bounced landing recovery at flying schools

Wikiposts
Search
Flying Instructors & Examiners A place for instructors to communicate with one another because some of them get a bit tired of the attitude that instructing is the lowest form of aviation, as seems to prevail on some of the other forums!

The teaching of (or absence of) bounced landing recovery at flying schools

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 5th Oct 2013, 04:00
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Try and land a 180/185 after a bounce without power... Thought it's a pretty basic technique? Obviously if you're short fielding into a paddock or small strip you haven't got that option, but as far as learning to recover a bounce, power is definitely the way to go.
cabcat is offline  
Old 5th Oct 2013, 07:29
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,338
Received 249 Likes on 117 Posts
'Fraid I've only got 10,000+ hours instructing in light aircraft, never flown the 737, never wanted to.

I learn from experience not form what I read or what other people tell me their instructors told them.

You need to be able to recover from a bounce without power in case you have no power.
Clare Prop is offline  
Old 5th Oct 2013, 08:38
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Albany, West Australia
Age: 83
Posts: 506
Received 19 Likes on 6 Posts
I'm also for the use of 'appropriate' power - having seen some amazing crashes due to freezing on the throttle and hoping full back stick will save the day. It might for a small bounce of a couple metres, but the 180/185 type bounce, (= a 'big red' effort), needs really co-ordinated recovery.
happy days,
poteroo is offline  
Old 5th Oct 2013, 09:57
  #24 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,131
Received 28 Likes on 10 Posts
Horatio, your comment

"I am surprised that nobody has yet mentioned the wording of the Day VFR Syllabus - which requires the recovery from a bounce WITHOUT ADDING POWER."

requires context.

It is in the unit A5.5 "Execute short take-off and landing" and says

"Controls ballooning during flare and bouncing after touchdown by adjustment of attitude without the application of power"

if they can't do that then the student is "not yet competent" in Unit A5.5, and you should refer to A4.3 "Perform mishandled landing procedures" ie "recognises when the landing standard cannot be achieved and implements a decision to perform mishandled landing (13)."

(13) refers to footnote "means to recognise an abnormal landing and recover the aircraft to controlled flight. often associated with a go-around".
Charlie Foxtrot India is offline  
Old 5th Oct 2013, 10:17
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: NSW Australia
Posts: 2,456
Received 33 Likes on 15 Posts
Hi CFI,

Actually it is repeated in A4.1 "Land Aeroplane":

Controls ballooning during flare and bouncing after touchdown by adjustment of attitude without the application of power
...and again in A4.2 "Land aeroplane in crosswind":

Controls ballooning during flare and bouncing after touchdown by adjustment of attitude without the application of power
A landing can be stuffed up and safely recovered with the appropriate use of power - which might be no power, or full power, or points in between.

I would rather see a student stuff it up in a test, and safely and competently recover, than perform perfectly. It is their assessment of the situation and the application of appropriate and safe recovery measures that properly demonstrates their competence.

I agree that recovering a bounce without power is important, but blindly trying to recover without power in a situation that demands it (because you are trying to satisfy words in a CASA document) is folly.
Horatio Leafblower is offline  
Old 5th Oct 2013, 20:59
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: France
Posts: 1,033
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
OK, you asked what glider pilots do for a bounced landing. I instruct on power (Dr400) and gliders, and fly a Cub for fun. In most glider landings we will be using airbrake, which will reduce to performançe from around 35 to 1 glide angle to about 10 to 1. So closing the airbrake will have much the same effect as partially opening the throttle. The basic teaching is to reduce the airbrake, and hold the stick where it is until the glider starts to descend again. At this point, without changing the airbrake setting, round out again, and hold off as usual. Once on the ground, go to full airbrake, wheel brake as required. Generally speaking, most training gliders have fairly benign handling, and not too much tendency to bounce, but we do look for a fully held off landing.

Some single seaters are happier with a more "flown on" style of landing, as are one or two high performance two seaters, but this is usually due to reduced aileron authority with flaps in landing settings. Generally speaking, a glider will be more akin to a power taildragger than a nosewheel type. However, most students will be solo after about eight hours and forty or so landings, assuming a reasonable amount of soaring in the early stages of training. Say about five or six flights between 30 minutes and an hour, then a number of shorter flights while learning circuit planning, aerotow launching, and landings. Winch trained pilots on a flat site typically have fewer hours to solo,but more landings, due to (usually) shorter flights.
Piper.Classique is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.