Wikiposts
Search
Flying Instructors & Examiners A place for instructors to communicate with one another because some of them get a bit tired of the attitude that instructing is the lowest form of aviation, as seems to prevail on some of the other forums!

JAR PPL Enroute section

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 2nd Aug 2008, 20:09
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: uk
Posts: 1,047
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
JAR PPL Enroute section

Fellow examiners.

Anybody point me in the direction of the official CAA publication that describes the Navigation enroute section of the JAR PPL Skill test.

For example are the legs A to B to C with diversion off the B to C leg or something different?

Examiner handbook doesn't say clearly, nor the Doc 19 for the candidate.
Need it all in black and white.

Thanks BEB.
BigEndBob is offline  
Old 2nd Aug 2008, 21:36
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,893
Received 348 Likes on 122 Posts
It used to be described quite clearly in the old Standards Document 20, but that's been withdrawn.....

Standards Document 19v4 para 3.6.6 is about all the real guidance there is these days.

I use a first leg of 40-50 nm and act as an 'intelligent passenger'. I will point out any other aircraft I see and just ask the applicant to tell me the ETA for the turning point and describe what he/she's doing if correcting a track error or updating the ETA.

The second leg is planned as 50-60nm; however, after 10 min the 'weather ahead deteriorates' and the applicant is then asked to divert to somewhere I indicate to him/her - but only when he/she is ready.
BEagle is online now  
Old 2nd Aug 2008, 22:52
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: uk
Posts: 1,047
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks, just as i have been doing, but have seen slightly different interpretation of doc 19v4 by an examiner causing some confussion.

Having been frustrated all afternoon trying to find the document in which the nav. section was described in more detail.

Alas no longer available.

Nice if we all sing from the same Hymn sheet.
BigEndBob is offline  
Old 3rd Aug 2008, 20:06
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: Lurking within the psyche of Dave Sawdon
Posts: 772
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
The "suggested brief" in appendix 2 of the FE Handbook backs-up what's in SD19 (diversion from second leg) - I do the same as BEagle. The only question I've seen (and discussed here) is where to put-in the radnav fix, everything else seems clear.

HFD
hugh flung_dung is offline  
Old 3rd Aug 2008, 20:51
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: uk
Posts: 1,047
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have seen the 'second leg' taken as being the diversion leg.
Which i pointed out to be incorrect so wanted the flight described in more detail, in 'black and white'.

I'm ok with the candidate doing a fix on the 2nd leg, diversion or ask to perform after the instrument turn, simulating unsure of position.
BigEndBob is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.