Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Other Aircrew Forums > Cabin Crew
Reload this Page >

British Airways vs. BASSA (current Airline Staff Only)

Wikiposts
Search
Cabin Crew Where professional flight attendants discuss matters that affect our jobs & lives.

British Airways vs. BASSA (current Airline Staff Only)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 20th Jul 2010, 12:42
  #1181 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Near the Mountains of Sussex
Posts: 270
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Results..........

So thats about 27 percent of CC rejecting the offer, 73 percent accepting or not bothering to vote / unable to vote
Blink182 is online now  
Old 20th Jul 2010, 12:46
  #1182 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: London
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
>>>3449 voted no to reject the offer
1686 voted to accept

circa 12600 cabin crew in total<<<<

WOW, such strenght amongst the BASSA ranks, what an amazing majority!....oh....how many crew were balloted!!?? Yes that's correct nearly 11,500 members! so not even half voted...

To quote old Blackadder:

If nothing else works, a total pig-headed unwillingness to look facts in the face will see us through.
WelcomeAboard is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2010, 12:48
  #1183 (permalink)  
Couldonlyaffordafiver
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: The Twilight Zone near 30W
Posts: 1,934
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
... but that's the BASSA membership who could be bothered to vote and given those particular numbers, BA's mission to render BASSA irrelevant appears to be working.

What about the "other" 7000 or so crew members who didn't vote? Can it be assumed that none of them are BASSA members? If so, the ex-BASSA numbers have increased a fair bit recently (I know they have but not by that much). If not, an awful lot of people probably saw the result as a foregone conclusion.

Either way, what happens next?

BA will have received a number of acceptances from non-union crew (ie. those who had left BASSA/Unite before the end of June) and presumably those people will be commencing that new contract in the next couple of months (complete with a top-up payment and a return of some staff travel privileges).

Those non-union members who did not reply coupled with those union members who were legally unable to reply (hence the union ballot) will probably find out the consequences fairly shortly. Given that BA have already announced that they intend to crew the full operation (longhaul certainly) in the event of another strike (rendering it irrelevant), I would suggest ninety days notice will be imminent followed by either dismissal or the offer of a "New Fleet" contract as this situation cannot be allowed to continue, especially as the offer in question was extremely reasonable.

What other alternatives are there? (open question - I'm sure I haven't thought of something)
Human Factor is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2010, 13:20
  #1184 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This was merely a consultative ballot and the reason for the low return was probably due to many people not receiving or returning their ballot papers in time.

I live in Germany and only received my ballot 5 days ago.

We have had a consultative ballot online before via the BASSA website, but the company objected to that hence the postal ballot.

It was NOT a "reasonable" offer, that is why it has been rejected. Why make an offer you know will be rejected? It just goes to show how out of touch Walsh is with his employees and the fact he is not serious about ending this dispute.

Interesting that no BA managers are available or willing to speak with the Press. They have known for a month that the result would be announced today. Why can't anyone except for Walsh face the Press? Doesn't he have any support?
Duggie Fashion is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2010, 13:24
  #1185 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: London
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Oddly enough after todays result I think that Willie enjoys more support than the BASSA committee.
the flying nunn is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2010, 13:30
  #1186 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: London
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Duggie:

"Interesting that no BA managers are available or willing to speak with the Press. They have known for a month that the result would be announced today. Why can't anyone except for Walsh face the Press? Doesn't he have any support?"

so.....on that note where were the Unite boys then? did they not know it was coming out today either?

Oh yes, they are in the Unite office consulting with BASSA!!!
No doubt they are wondering why BASSA persists in making them look so stupid all the time
WelcomeAboard is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2010, 13:36
  #1187 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: South of MAN, North of BHX, and well clear of Stoke ;-)
Posts: 487
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Interesting that no BA managers are available or willing to speak with the Press. They have known for a month that the result would be announced today. Why can't anyone except for Walsh face the Press?
Because they and everyone else can see that these are the final, gasping death throes of a fatally flawed campaign by BASSA Duncan.

Approx. 50% of your membership couldn't be bothered to return their ballot paper; they are war weary, disillusioned, financially hard up and basically fed up of the lies, spin and lack of leadership. Many now finally realise this was a campaign orchestrated to protect those at the top of the BASSA hierarchy, and that they, the masses, your members, have been used as pawns to fight a battle for a very elite few.

It's over; you must feel so proud.
StoneyBridge Radar is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2010, 13:37
  #1188 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: on boeings finest
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Doug said
This was merely a consultative ballot and the reason for the low return was probably due to many people not receiving or returning their ballot papers in time.
........... so who's fault is that? No use blaming a poor ballot result on a time frame organised buy your union, talk about shoot yourself in the foot
Pornpants1 is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2010, 13:38
  #1189 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: AROUND AND ABOUT
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The ballot was a bit of mess IMO. On Bassa's website it states membership of just over 9500. I can tell you its a lot less than that. I left weeks ago as did a friend yet we both got ballot papers. Flew with a girl last week who left Bassa in March, ad she got a ballot too!!!!. It shows to me that there are around 3500 strikers - no more. Let them strike. It will be another nice few weeks flying with crew who you know are on your side. Seems time to stoke up the braziers. Word of advice. Don't get your fingers burnt - in more ways than one!
JUAN TRIPP is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2010, 13:39
  #1190 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There are similarities with the dispute at the Royal Mail and British Airways.

After a series of bitter national strikes, industrial relations were only normalised at the Royal Mail after its CEO Adam Crozier left for ITN.

Walsh departs BA in October. Then perhaps there will be a settlement.
Duggie Fashion is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2010, 13:40
  #1191 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Near the Mountains of Sussex
Posts: 270
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
It was NOT a "reasonable" offer, that is why it has been rejected. Why make an offer you know will be rejected?
27 percent against , 73 percent not against.

Duncan , you need to have a maths lesson..... the offer has not been rejected by the majority of BA Cabin Crew
Blink182 is online now  
Old 20th Jul 2010, 13:49
  #1192 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: AROUND AND ABOUT
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Welcome to the BASSA members' website

The British Airlines Stewards and Stewardesses Association (BASSA) is a branch of the Transport & General Worker's Union (T&GWU) exclusively for British Airways cabin crew. Our membership currently stands at 9757 which makes us the largest branch of the T&GWU.

BASSA is an active and progressive union, which is entirely staffed by elected representatives, all of whom work as BA cabin crew. We are therefore fully involved in every aspect of cabin crew working life, including rosters and scheduling, pay, hotels, allowances and all working agreements and conditions.


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


The above is the welcome note to any prospective new members. I've highlighted the red bit as its just laughable - obviously written by the old scribe DH!! ' An active and progressive union' Whaaaaaaat!! 'We are fully involved in every aspect of CC working lives.!! Thats when they can be bothered to leave their £100/day office. Surely someone could easily sue them under the trades description act
JUAN TRIPP is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2010, 13:54
  #1193 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Pogles Wood
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Duggie

It was NOT a "reasonable" offer, that is why it has been rejected. Why make an offer you know will be rejected? It just goes to show how out of touch Walsh is with his employees and the fact he is not serious about ending this dispute
The only people out of touch are the likes of yourself who seem to think the non cabin crew staff should take the hit whilst you don't. Don't get me started on your alternative proposal...A LOAN!

That's why there are further VCC's to be trained..because many staff are angry at your ill conceived stance. Staff that have NOT had pay rises for three years, though adapted to significant change in working practises, and certainly do NOT have guarantees . Furthermore, we absolutely refuse to let a minority of la la land die hards hold the company to ransom.

My (our) patience has exhausted.

You will not win. That's a guarantee.
ranger07 is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2010, 14:10
  #1194 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: South of MAN, North of BHX, and well clear of Stoke ;-)
Posts: 487
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BASSA is an active and progressive union, which is entirely staffed by elected representatives, all of whom work as BA cabin crew.
Panto season's come early; OH NO THEY DON'T !!!
StoneyBridge Radar is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2010, 14:16
  #1195 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Pogles Wood
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
oh, and Duggie

Walsh departs BA in October. Then perhaps there will be a settlement.
I'm trying to think of an eloqouent way to say this, easily perceived and understood. Here goes.

The Board back Mr Walsh.

If the above is still incoherent, please advise and I'll try again.
ranger07 is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2010, 14:21
  #1196 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: London
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
>>Ranger,

In theory he is off late in 2010 to become CEO of IAG, hence technically Duggie is correct. Though he is twisting the fact to suit his argument!
WelcomeAboard is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2010, 14:23
  #1197 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The explanation why so many groundstaff have volunteered to be VCC, is they think that this is a bypass of the system to become full time cabin crew, rather than any loyalty to British Airways.

Most groundstaff are envious of the cabin crew and very few crew ever leave flying to work on the ground, unless it is for medical reasons.
Duggie Fashion is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2010, 14:25
  #1198 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Pogles Wood
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In theory he is off late in 2010 to become CEO of IAG, hence technically Duggie is correct. Though he is twisting the fact to suit his argument!
Yes, but the board have backed him, and Keith Williams will continue standing up to the BASSAsauras Rex with the continued support of the board.

Last edited by ranger07; 20th Jul 2010 at 14:38.
ranger07 is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2010, 14:31
  #1199 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: uk
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The only reason that I, as a fully licencsed BA aircraft engineer, would want to become cabin crew would be to get a pay rise. Otherwise that last sentence had me laughing my a##e off.
swalesboy is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2010, 14:31
  #1200 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Lalaland
Age: 55
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Duggie Fashion

BA urged the union to accept the offer, arguing that the low turnout meant Unite had "lost the moral authority" to represent the views of staff.
"We are encouraged by the result of this ballot which shows that 73% of our cabin crew did not reject our offer," the airline said.
"With only around a quarter of our cabin crew voting against the deal, support for Unite is ebbing away.
"We would urge them to come back to the table to sign the agreement and end the dispute."
Duggie Fashion - I'm interested in your view on the above statement taken from Sky News - Link Below - Thanks.

Cabin Crew Reject BA's Final Offer: Unite Reveals Ballot Result That Raises Threat Of More Strikes | Business | Sky News
Meal Chucker is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.