Wikiposts
Search
ATC Issues A place where pilots may enter the 'lions den' that is Air Traffic Control in complete safety and find out the answers to all those obscure topics which you always wanted to know the answer to but were afraid to ask.

Ground Stations

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 27th Nov 2002, 09:06
  #1 (permalink)  
Seasonally Adjusted
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: ...deep fine leg
Posts: 1,125
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question Ground Stations

Greetings to all you ATC types out there.

I am a humble bush pilot from down under and have a question.

I occasionally here Melbourne Centre say to an aircraft, "..in with a ground station, go again."

What is a ground station? My first thought was another controller on some kind of intercom. Am I close?
Towering Q is offline  
Old 27th Nov 2002, 19:50
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Fort Worth ARTCC ZFW
Posts: 1,155
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool

Never heard of that from this side of the world...

regards
Scott Voigt is offline  
Old 27th Nov 2002, 20:44
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Near Stalyvegas
Age: 78
Posts: 2,022
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Probly"Jumping a Jumbuck" [That's "Ozzie" for 'Dancing'] under a Kooliba Tree, in a Bilabong. And the tx stuck
we aim to please, it keeps the cleaners happy
chiglet is offline  
Old 28th Nov 2002, 06:56
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Towering Q you are 100% correct.

Since transition to TAAATS this has been a bigger problem. Under the old system we had the ability to control the volume of the air/ground and ground/ground seperately. It was standard practise to set one higher than the other (depending on controller preference but most had air/ground higher than ground/ground) so you would hear either your ground/ground or air/ground clearly clearly when two transmissions were coming in. Under TAAAAAATS we have lost this ability and they are both set at the same level and often both end up being garbled resulting in have to "say again" to the aircraft and to the other controller.
willadvise is offline  
Old 28th Nov 2002, 23:49
  #5 (permalink)  
Seasonally Adjusted
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: ...deep fine leg
Posts: 1,125
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs up

Willadvise, thanks for that informative response. It's always handy to get some insight into what goes on down there in Melbourne. (I don't venture into the world of Brisbane very often.)

I've started talking to you chaps, (and chapettes) a lot more now that I've got the Instrument Rating. Still prefer to go VFR when heading into remote areas and the weather is 8/8 severe clear.

Does it annoy you when these Gumbys call up asking for the QNH when they have just left an aerodrome with a listed elevation?
Towering Q is offline  
Old 29th Nov 2002, 05:11
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

For me personally it doesn't annoy me very much unless I am very busy with IFR aircraft or they are within range of a VHF flightwatch frequency or AERIS. But it is a part of ASA's push to push the VFRs (non paying customers) out of the system. Hence the first NAS changes. My understanding is that most "Gumbys" call up for the QNH just to get their voice on the tape or to make sure that their radio is working and they are on the correct frequency. The NAS changes have done nothing (we are still very early on adimittedly) to reduce the number of transmissions. Instead of getting an AQNH request we are now getting more requests for radio checks and/or for METARs which take us longer to find and transmit.
For an old fashioned person like me I think the VFRs are an important part of Australian aviation and the government should be paying for the provision of a safe, government run, air traffic control system for everybody rather than a comercially focused dot.com.
willadvise is offline  
Old 2nd Dec 2002, 02:17
  #7 (permalink)  
Seasonally Adjusted
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: ...deep fine leg
Posts: 1,125
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hopefully getting rid of the CASA board is a step in the right direction.
Towering Q is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2002, 02:19
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Darraweit Guim, Victoria
Age: 65
Posts: 509
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Unhappy

Gee Willadvise, you are lucky. Our intercoms are set much louder than our radios... Really crap part of the design that there four different volume controls that achieve nothing useful, and no adjustment for the parameter you really need.

Bring back the Flight Service PFS-2 console audio please!
Spodman is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.