Wikiposts
Search
Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

Luton-10

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11th Jun 2024, 14:54
  #4501 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Not so many places currently
Age: 60
Posts: 3,894
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Falcon666
New routes to

Athens 3p/w. ( Ryanair not operating this route W24)
Basel up to 5 p/w ( Reintroduction after several years)
Djerba 2p/w
I had to lookup that third destination, I see TUI Germany have a regular programme, perhaps jump in with Holidays division before TUI UK do?
pabely is offline  
Old 11th Jun 2024, 16:27
  #4502 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: East Midlands
Posts: 547
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by pabely
I had to lookup that third destination, I see TUI Germany have a regular programme, perhaps jump in with Holidays division before TUI UK do?
It was a growing route for Thomas Cook before their demise. If TUI UK wanted to go, they would. If anything they'll buy up seats on this easyJet service to offer their packages here.
Cazza_fly is offline  
Old 11th Jun 2024, 19:10
  #4503 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: southern spain
Posts: 2,014
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
It was also very popular in the 1970s and 1980s with IT operators (Cosmos, Thomson etc).
compton3bravo is offline  
Old 11th Jun 2024, 19:25
  #4504 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 3,156
Received 463 Likes on 267 Posts
LHR-Djerba was operated by British Eagle the summer season before they collapsed.

The resorts around there have long been popular with German and French tourists. One assumes Easyjet Holidays has bought in some hotel capacity and is giving it a try.

I must say it looks quite good as a package destination.
ATNotts is offline  
Old 12th Jun 2024, 17:09
  #4505 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Under the flight path
Posts: 2,639
Received 14 Likes on 5 Posts
The co-ordination report shows a planned increase by Dan-Air from 2x weekly to almost daily, and a doubling of Fly One from daily to twice daily.
The rejected application from Ryanair implies that they were looking to base the equivalent of about 5-6 more aircraft (depending on sector times).
LGS6753 is offline  
Old 12th Jun 2024, 18:39
  #4506 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: No fixed abode
Posts: 806
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 1 Post
Tender is out for Taxiway Alpha extension of 340mtrs
Falcon666 is offline  
Old 12th Jun 2024, 19:10
  #4507 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: In the sticks
Posts: 9,940
Received 11 Likes on 7 Posts
Only companies that begin with the letter R will be considered.

As per runway 07 the taxiway will not go to the end of the runway.
LTNman is online now  
Old 12th Jun 2024, 19:26
  #4508 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Not so many places currently
Age: 60
Posts: 3,894
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by LTNman
Only companies that begin with the letter R will be considered.

As per runway 07 the taxiway will not go to the end of the runway.
Incumbent Contractor - quite common in business. All sorts of hidden costs when you go for a strict cheapest quote.

Alpha Taxiway extension will greatly speed up 25 departures though to stop 6/7 aircraft along Alpha waiting their their turn.
Also 07 arrivals in challenging conditions will be able to exit without a backtrack.
pabely is offline  
Old 12th Jun 2024, 19:27
  #4509 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Not so many places currently
Age: 60
Posts: 3,894
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by LGS6753
The co-ordination report shows a planned increase by Dan-Air from 2x weekly to almost daily, and a doubling of Fly One from daily to twice daily.
The rejected application from Ryanair implies that they were looking to base the equivalent of about 5-6 more aircraft (depending on sector times).
Looking at the aircraft split mix for approved slots, few 738s and mostly Max.
Luton must be doing something right for RYR with fortress STN just up the road.
pabely is offline  
Old 12th Jun 2024, 20:16
  #4510 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Hyperspace
Posts: 731
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by Falcon666
Tender is out for Taxiway Alpha extension of 340mtrs
Well, they must have nearly enough piled-up infill now for this job!
boeing_eng is offline  
The following 2 users liked this post by boeing_eng:
Old 17th Jun 2024, 15:56
  #4511 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Not so many places currently
Age: 60
Posts: 3,894
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by boeing_eng
Well, they must have nearly enough piled-up infill now for this job!
Even enough for foundations for the new Skate Park!
https://www.lutontoday.co.uk/news/po...-luton-4666876
pabely is offline  
Old 17th Jun 2024, 18:28
  #4512 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: In the sticks
Posts: 9,940
Received 11 Likes on 7 Posts
Mark Turner, Luton Rising’s service director, said: “Work on these fabulous new facilities marks the first step in honouring the promise we made to people living nearby to ensure that improvements to Wigmore Park are brought forward ahead of our proposed future developments in and around the airport.”
Plan to destroy most of a park and call it an improvement. All part of the corporate lie that fools no one. As for the promise, they had no choice as the “improvements” are part of a section 106 agreement.


LTNman is online now  
Old 17th Jun 2024, 19:25
  #4513 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Luton
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by LTNman
Plan to destroy most of a park and call it an improvement. All part of the corporate lie that fools no one. As for the promise, they had no choice as the “improvements” are part of a section 106 agreement.
.

LTNman you failed to mention that the park is a former landfill site and from 1978 converted to what it is today. I see no reason why they can not relocate it to the planned location which will be far bigger than the park today. Further more Wigmore was once fields but today turned into housing estates. Did you fight your cause back then?
Lee Baker Street is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 17th Jun 2024, 20:18
  #4514 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Not so many places currently
Age: 60
Posts: 3,894
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Probably needs to turn attention to proposed housing development at Cockernhoe now.
I remember when I was looking at property in Luton in 86, I thought Wigmore was not a good spot, the whole Pavilion area was a no go area at night, totally run down. I settled for a property between Memorial & Stockwood Parks, both well looked after and the Airport never bothered me, in fact most neighbours were either directly or indirectly employed by Airport, as I was.
I left that property in 2014, still not bothered by Airport noise, in fact other neighbours were glad for it after Vauxhalls Car production had declined so much.
pabely is offline  
Old 17th Jun 2024, 21:12
  #4515 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Hyperspace
Posts: 731
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by Lee Baker Street
.

LTNman you failed to mention that the park is a former landfill site and from 1978 converted to what it is today. I see no reason why they can not relocate it to the planned location which will be far bigger than the park today. Further more Wigmore was once fields but today turned into housing estates. Did you fight your cause back then?
If you do a bit of research you'll find that Wigmore Park was created as a noise buffer for the residents of the then new Wigmore estate in the 1980's. The park is now a very valuable local asset but the Council of course choose to ignore this and offer a very poor replacement (which is basically famers fields some distance away!)
boeing_eng is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 18th Jun 2024, 06:02
  #4516 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: In the sticks
Posts: 9,940
Received 11 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by Lee Baker Street
.

LTNman you failed to mention that the park is a former landfill site and from 1978 converted to what it is today. I see no reason why they can not relocate it to the planned location which will be far bigger than the park today. Further more Wigmore was once fields but today turned into housing estates. Did you fight your cause back then?
And you have fail to mention that the landfill site attained official status as a recognised County Wildlife Site many years ago and together with the rest of the park has two Asset of Community Value orders placed on it, as nature has been allowed to do its thing. Replacing a park that has been twice voted best park in Bedfordshire with a former turnip field in a different County is not exactly replacing like for like.

https://stoplae.org/wigmore-valley-park-wins-award/

Last edited by LTNman; 18th Jun 2024 at 06:48.
LTNman is online now  
Old 18th Jun 2024, 17:14
  #4517 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Italy
Posts: 395
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
FR's LTN base

Hi all,

Some questions re. Ryanair's base at LTN. How many a/c are currently based at Luton, and how many of these are the new 737-MAX's? I wonder if they will want to increase the number of a/c at LTN going forward; are there any plans currently for them to do this?
JW95 is offline  
Old 18th Jun 2024, 17:41
  #4518 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Under the flight path
Posts: 2,639
Received 14 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by JW95
Hi all,

Some questions re. Ryanair's base at LTN. How many a/c are currently based at Luton, and how many of these are the new 737-MAX's? I wonder if they will want to increase the number of a/c at LTN going forward; are there any plans currently for them to do this?
Currently 7 based plus a fair amount of away-based ops. Ryanair requested slots equivalent to basing a further 5/6 aircraft for W24/5. At least 3 of the based aircraft are Maxs.
LGS6753 is offline  
Old 18th Jun 2024, 18:08
  #4519 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Not so many places currently
Age: 60
Posts: 3,894
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by LGS6753
Currently 7 based plus a fair amount of away-based ops. Ryanair requested slots equivalent to basing a further 5/6 aircraft for W24/5. At least 3 of the based aircraft are Maxs.
Looking at the W24 slot allocations, more Max8 than 738s so I suspect down to only 1 or 2 738s by then.

This caught my eye highlighting Signature & Luxaviation- just see the charging points and wires across the apron!
https://aviationweek.com/aerospace/a...er-fbo-network
pabely is offline  
Old 18th Jun 2024, 18:13
  #4520 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: No fixed abode
Posts: 806
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 1 Post
Originally Posted by LGS6753
Currently 7 based plus a fair amount of away-based ops. Ryanair requested slots equivalent to basing a further 5/6 aircraft for W24/5. At least 3 of the based aircraft are Maxs.
Am surprised they requested so many slots, they know LTN is full stand wise overnight .
If it was for away based Aircraft slots during the day that would blow the 18M cap currently.
Maybe they hoped 19M would have been approved by now.
Falcon666 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.