Wikiposts
Search
Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

Manchester-3

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 25th Apr 2023, 07:43
  #2401 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Warwickshire
Posts: 1,082
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Not that this will happen but I swear I flew LGW-MAN on Jet2 in 2004? It was for a job interview, I lived near Brighton at the time and it was far cheaper and quicker than getting the train!

​​​​​I'm surprised there is seemingly not enough P2P demand for a MAN-LGW service, given the long driving time and unreliable rail service that requires a cross London journey on the Tube
GayFriendly is offline  
Old 25th Apr 2023, 07:55
  #2402 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Uttoxeter
Age: 46
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by GayFriendly
Not that this will happen but I swear I flew LGW-MAN on Jet2 in 2004? It was for a job interview, I lived near Brighton at the time and it was far cheaper and quicker than getting the train!
You're not wrong. The route started in January 2004 with prices starting from £15 one way. I can't remember when it ended though.....
sportzbar is offline  
Old 25th Apr 2023, 07:58
  #2403 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: WILMSLOW
Age: 61
Posts: 199
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
First flight 17th January 2005 and final flight 24th March 2007
MARK9263 is online now  
Old 25th Apr 2023, 08:49
  #2404 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: .
Posts: 471
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by GayFriendly
I'm surprised there is seemingly not enough P2P demand for a MAN-LGW service, given the long driving time and unreliable rail service that requires a cross London journey on the Tube
I can get a train from Gatwick airport to Manchester Piccadilly in 3 hrs 4 mins according to google maps. Unless feeding long haul flights I don't see how an airline is competitive with that on purely P2P traffic.

I think VLM used to do Manchester - City but the improvements to the West Coast mainline a decade ago or so killed it off.
cavokblues is offline  
Old 25th Apr 2023, 10:26
  #2405 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: London
Age: 43
Posts: 1,622
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by cavokblues
I can get a train from Gatwick airport to Manchester Piccadilly in 3 hrs 4 mins according to google maps. Unless feeding long haul flights I don't see how an airline is competitive with that on purely P2P traffic.

I think VLM used to do Manchester - City but the improvements to the West Coast mainline a decade ago or so killed it off.
Killed it stone dead at the same time as LCY-LPL sadly, LCY was a proper focus city for blue Fokkers and MAN was a base if I recall correctly?
Skipness One Foxtrot is offline  
Old 25th Apr 2023, 11:13
  #2406 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Blighty
Posts: 5,675
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes on 17 Posts
I thought the only reason for the additional London - Manchester/Liverpool flights around 2005-2007 was because the engineering work to upgrade the train line out of Euston made the train service absolutely hopeless. Yes, it was seriously sh*t - made the service in 2023 look absolutely admirable, even with all the irregularities over the last 12 months. Around 2006, you never knew until maybe a week in advance if there would be trains on a particular day or not - and no most people don't want to spend an extra 2 hours on a bus between two different trains en route.
davidjohnson6 is offline  
Old 25th Apr 2023, 11:32
  #2407 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: .
Posts: 471
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
IIRC even Eastern tried Stansted - Manchester in the mid 2000s?

Quite a few operators back then dipping their toes into the market.
cavokblues is offline  
Old 25th Apr 2023, 12:38
  #2408 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: SYD
Posts: 538
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
​​​​​I'm surprised there is seemingly not enough P2P demand for a MAN-LGW service
It was never a customer demand problem. It is the availability of scarce runway slots at single-runway LGW. Those slots are a highly-prized resource which end up allocated to the most lucrative route bidding to use them. Timings which wrap around the regular business day are particularly elusive. Viewed as a standalone, MAN-LGW could be profitable. But that is irrelevant: there are other routes vying for those peak slots which are more lucrative and more profitable. The more compelling proposition will prevail. Supply and demand in action.

Although there was a short-lived MAN-LGW schedule last year, that came at a time when the post-covid recovery left unusual slot availability in the short-term. With normal service resumed, peak LGW slots will not trickle down to a MAN service.
OzzyOzBorn is offline  
Old 25th Apr 2023, 14:31
  #2409 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 356
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by laviation
One thinks EasyJet will launch this MAN-SOU route at some point. 5x weekly A319. It still baffles me why they don’t fly LGW-MAN; no connection onto BA ever since they dropped the Gatwick route!
easyJet were asked to reduce their domestic ops for this summer after the debacle last year surrounding T1 Domestics/CTA having to be bussed in and sometimes half an hour (plus) waits whilst the buses manoeuvred around the one door. Only once they move over to T2 I can see them coming back onto ABZ/INV and potentially SOU/LGW.
planedrive is offline  
Old 25th Apr 2023, 15:49
  #2410 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: SYD
Posts: 538
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
If it is true that a MAG executive ASKED EasyJet to withdraw certain domestic services, then I would like to ASK that executive to find another job more suited to his / her skill level. Somewhere else. Not at Manchester. We've not long lost the FlyBe domestic hub, for goodness sake. And the trains are in chaos.

PLEASE REASSURE ME THAT IT AIN'T SO!!!

Something lost in translation, maybe?
OzzyOzBorn is offline  
Old 25th Apr 2023, 16:55
  #2411 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2023
Location: GB
Posts: 264
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Absolutely crazy if the EZY rumour is true!! Really would put the cherry on the top of MAG poor management. In other news, Jetblue formally announced the Amsterdam routes today. That is now 4 routes launching this year to CDG and AMS. I’d like to think the next targets will be Lisbon, then Dublin and then Manchester? I say this knowing full well this won’t happen, given the apparent recent actions of the management!
laviation is offline  
Old 25th Apr 2023, 17:23
  #2412 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: Southampton
Posts: 220
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts
Originally Posted by cavokblues
IIRC even Eastern tried Stansted - Manchester in the mid 2000s?

Quite a few operators back then dipping their toes into the market.
​​​​Manchester to London Stansted was originally started by Manx Airways in 1992 which was subsequently taken over by British Airways.

BA/JE 7821 DEP MAN 06.50 ARR STN 07.50 J31 Daily ex Sat, Sun
BA/JE 7823 DEP MAN 10.35 ARR STN 11.35 J31 Daily ex Sat, Sun
BA/JE 7825 DEP MAN 17.30 ARR STN 18.30 J31 Daily ex Sat, Sun

BA/JE 7822 DEP STN 08.20 ARR MAN 09.20 J31 Daily ex Sat, Sun
BA/JE 7824 DEP STN 16.00 ARR MAN 17.00 J31 Daily ex Sat, Sun
BA/JE 7826 DEP STN 19.00 ARR MAN 20.00 J31 Daily ex Sat, Sun

British Airways axed MAN-STN in 2001 and the route was subsequently taken over by Eastern Airways. The same schedule was more or less kept to the original British Airways timings. I can't quite remember what year Eastern Airways abandoned the route, but I believe that it was around 2003/2004 although I stand to be corrected.

Regarding MAN-SOU

With the loss of MAN-SOU and the total unreliability of Eastern Airways the major cruise lines operating from the Port of Southampton have had to arrange additional coaches to transfer passengers between the two points. In normal circumstances up to two coaches would be available per ship from Manchester and from the surrounding area. For this coming cruise season which has recently commenced there will be up to six coaches per ship from Manchester and the surrounding areas. The ports parking facilities for cruise passengers has had to be expanded by 1200 places to accommodate the extra vehicles. MAN-SOU was always a very popular route for passengers joining their cruise from the Port of Southampton.

The Port of Southampton is Europe's busiest cruise turnaround port with five dedicated cruise terminals with up to twenty cruise company's operating from the Port. The average cruise ship departing the port accommodates up to 3,000 passengers. The Port of Southampton has 586 cruise calls for 2023 with approximately 2.3 million passengers expected through it's five cruise terminals.

A great deal of passengers arriving at the Port of Southampton from Scotland to join their cruise are using the services of Loganair. As mentioned above there are coaching opportunities direct to the Port of Southampton plus the unreliable railways. MAN-SOU is and has always been a very popular route, not just for passengers joining their cruise from the port but also for the wider region.

Southampton is the largest and most important city on the south coast and MAN-SOU serves a purpose and plays a very important part in the UK's domestic connectivity. The population of the City of Southampton and it's metro area is approximately 1.5 million.

Hopefully an airline far more reliable than Eastern Airways will eventually take on the route.


Last edited by Sotonsean; 25th Apr 2023 at 21:12.
Sotonsean is offline  
Old 26th Apr 2023, 03:03
  #2413 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Oka
Posts: 48
Received 22 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by chaps1954
Certainly would not have called American reliable infact they were pretty useless what ever aircraft was used and got worse as the years progressed
I used to use American and the legacy Cactus route 10-12 round trips a year without much of any major incident.

Yes the 752 J product was inferior but they usually departed on time and I got the miles. Wasn’t much of anything wrong with the A333.

It’s a real shame that they never managed to make the 788 work on the JFK rotation. TCX probably kiboshed that and then went pop.

Last edited by Bbtengineer; 26th Apr 2023 at 03:15.
Bbtengineer is offline  
Old 26th Apr 2023, 08:34
  #2414 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Manchester
Posts: 1,366
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Given MAGs track record on freight, it would not surprise me at all if they (MAG) want to discourage any domestic flights. Let's face it- there are no specific domestic facilities & pax experience isn't great in T3. Probably in the too difficult tray, wanting to concentrate on high spending in shops bucket and spade flights.
Given the rail network state, MAG could have had a decent domestic business if they invested or cared about it.
Mr A Tis is offline  
Old 26th Apr 2023, 08:36
  #2415 (permalink)  
Guest
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Sotonsean
​​​​Manchester to London Stansted was originally started by Manx Airways in 1992 which was subsequently taken over by British Airways.

BA/JE 7821 DEP MAN 06.50 ARR STN 07.50 J31 Daily ex Sat, Sun
BA/JE 7823 DEP MAN 10.35 ARR STN 11.35 J31 Daily ex Sat, Sun
BA/JE 7825 DEP MAN 17.30 ARR STN 18.30 J31 Daily ex Sat, Sun

BA/JE 7822 DEP STN 08.20 ARR MAN 09.20 J31 Daily ex Sat, Sun
BA/JE 7824 DEP STN 16.00 ARR MAN 17.00 J31 Daily ex Sat, Sun
BA/JE 7826 DEP STN 19.00 ARR MAN 20.00 J31 Daily ex Sat, Sun

British Airways axed MAN-STN in 2001 and the route was subsequently taken over by Eastern Airways. The same schedule was more or less kept to the original British Airways timings. I can't quite remember what year Eastern Airways abandoned the route, but I believe that it was around 2003/2004 although I stand to be corrected.

Regarding MAN-SOU

With the loss of MAN-SOU and the total unreliability of Eastern Airways the major cruise lines operating from the Port of Southampton have had to arrange additional coaches to transfer passengers between the two points. In normal circumstances up to two coaches would be available per ship from Manchester and from the surrounding area. For this coming cruise season which has recently commenced there will be up to six coaches per ship from Manchester and the surrounding areas. The ports parking facilities for cruise passengers has had to be expanded by 1200 places to accommodate the extra vehicles. MAN-SOU was always a very popular route for passengers joining their cruise from the Port of Southampton.

The Port of Southampton is Europe's busiest cruise turnaround port with five dedicated cruise terminals with up to twenty cruise company's operating from the Port. The average cruise ship departing the port accommodates up to 3,000 passengers. The Port of Southampton has 586 cruise calls for 2023 with approximately 2.3 million passengers expected through it's five cruise terminals.

A great deal of passengers arriving at the Port of Southampton from Scotland to join their cruise are using the services of Loganair. As mentioned above there are coaching opportunities direct to the Port of Southampton plus the unreliable railways. MAN-SOU is and has always been a very popular route, not just for passengers joining their cruise from the port but also for the wider region.

Southampton is the largest and most important city on the south coast and MAN-SOU serves a purpose and plays a very important part in the UK's domestic connectivity. The population of the City of Southampton and it's metro area is approximately 1.5 million.

Hopefully an airline far more reliable than Eastern Airways will eventually take on the route.
A solution to the MAN-SOU problem ( I am actually trying to book to SOU myself for Aug and Nov, probably rail now) is to re-introduce LPL-SOU. The route has operated over a number of years by ATS Vulcan , FlyBe and Eastern. Was popular, LPL also services the NW, its one of the UKs biggest ports ( inc cruises ) and the airport could handle a domestic service such as this easily.
BACsuperVC10 is offline  
Old 26th Apr 2023, 10:41
  #2416 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: London
Posts: 878
Received 18 Likes on 8 Posts
I somewhat suggest this is playing in the background within MAG Group and that their current marketing teams have been diminished because alleged and potentially illegal cross selling

Manchester-3

I (opinion) expect the Manchester Team are sans deep leadership right now

Cargo was being handled via the East Midlands team. Stansted has its own problems with funding development and parent remains in a recovery process and in financial hock on T2 with known tarmac and parking ( airside) limitations.

I suggest and suspect Manchester remains in consolidation mode through to 2024 even 2025 .

No evidence but that rumour re Easy and domestics ( lack) fits plausibly with such a narrative .

Greenfinch I suppose Speke could pick up the baton on domestics especially with some financial incentive packages and even with a PSO or two.

Problems remain viable operators do they not , we have Loganair, Blue Island and Eastern left and none has enough aircraft or crews to work existing schedules let alone prepare for growth.
Loganair has set their target on prioritising and building up their remedial slots at Windsor and Slough regional
Blue Island I think they work on the dartboard approach and are constantly switching and cancelling routes
And Eastern no comment.

So who do you suggest ?

It also wouldn’t improve provincial connectivity INTO the Manchester long haul product would it.

BTW read elsewhere that the JLA tin can terminal has structural issues almost as bad as pier B and that Peel aren’t interested; is this true ?

Last edited by Rutan16; 26th Apr 2023 at 10:57.
Rutan16 is online now  
Old 26th Apr 2023, 10:50
  #2417 (permalink)  
Guest
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Rutan16
I somewhat suggest this is playing in the background within MAG Group and that their current marketing teams have been diminished because alleged and potentially illegal cross selling

Manchester-3

I (opinion) expect the Manchester Team are sans deep leadership right now

Cargo was being handled via the East Midlands team. Stansted has its own problems with funding development and parent remains in a recovery process and in financial hock on T2 with known tarmac and parking ( airside) limitations.

I suggest and suspect Manchester remains in consolidation mode through to 2024 even 2025 .

No evidence but that rumour re Easy and domestics ( lack) fits plausibly with such a narrative .

Greenfinch I suppose Speke pick up the baton on domestics with some financial incentive packages and even with a PSO or two.
It wouldn’t however improve provincial connectivity INTO the Manchester long haul product through.

BTW read elsewhere that the JLA tin can terminal has structural issues almost as bad as pier B and that Peel aren’t interested; is this true ?
People from SOU would not be interested in the MAN long haul product with LHR and LGW available to them. and No
BACsuperVC10 is offline  
Old 26th Apr 2023, 11:02
  #2418 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: London
Posts: 878
Received 18 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by BACsuperVC10
People from SOU would not be interested in the MAN long haul product with LHR and LGW available to them. and No
Prior to collapse of Flybe one Virgin and Emirates actually received some considerable feed from the regions indeed go back far enough and BAs New York service received feed from Southampton in particular

And the consolidators routinely offer fare bundles via what might seem odd combinations at times .

No doesn’t answer the second question posed you on the structural issues cladding etc….. ( I’ll wink here as I have an enquiry about that very issue on my desk )
Rutan16 is online now  
Old 26th Apr 2023, 11:13
  #2419 (permalink)  
Guest
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Rutan16
Prior to collapse of Flybe one Virgin and Emirates actually received some considerable feed from the regions indeed go back far enough and BAs New York service received feed from Southampton in particular

And the consolidators routinely offer fare bundles via what might seem odd combinations at times .

No doesn’t answer the second question posed you on the structural issues cladding etc….. ( I’ll wink here as I have an enquiry about that very issue on my desk )
There is only 2 flights a day, so feed is not what is was, if it was at all. Fares are always less from London anyway, so why would you.. I said No, have no idea what you are talking about, passing through LPL on Sunday, I will look to see if anything is a drift.
BACsuperVC10 is offline  
Old 26th Apr 2023, 11:51
  #2420 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: London
Posts: 878
Received 18 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by BACsuperVC10
There is only 2 flights a day, so feed is not what is was, if it was at all. Fares are always less from London anyway, so why would you.. I said No, have no idea what you are talking about, passing through LPL on Sunday, I will look to see if anything is a drift.
It’s external sheeting cladding and internal fire containment and stopping work to the structural frame . Doubt you’ll know what to look for
The works to the structural steelwork is extensive much concealed and therefore a structural risk

Now I am loath to quote to be honest as the last job cost me 165k for 120 days

These sorts of issues are actually pretty common and unlike Pier 2 at least there isn’t an asbestos issue .

Manchester had about a quarter of a million transfer passengers per year prior to COVID and Flybe collapse Not insignifiant

Indeed prior to the collapse of Thomas Cook Uk their flights were in code share with Condor with Lufthansa connections so Manchester can work as a hub with the right infrastructure
You don’t become a near 30 million pa airport with 40 operators without some levels of inward feed operations

Rutan16 is online now  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.