Ireland West Airport Knock
Join Date: Nov 2022
Location: IRL
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Glasgow
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That has happened most Tuesday mornings this summer, not unusual to have two or three Ryanair aircraft holding over Leitrim at around half eight on a Tuesday morning. No further developments with the Apron or other proposed improvements that I'm aware of. It's an ambitious terminal and apron expansion proposal, one of those that will either happen in one big investment or won't happen at all.
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: London
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
For example, the Irish government earlier this year announced €5m in capital funding for Knock, €400k for Kerry, and more for other Irish regional airports, totalling €17m. The government is reportedly also providing €12m in operational expenditure support for the regional airports in 2023 (I would include a link but PPRUNE does not allow me to do so.)
The other disguised funding stream for regional airports is the PSO programme. Until Ryanair put paid to Kerry's PSO service by launching a commercial (unsubsidised) Dublin-Kerry route, Kerry Airport made a very nice income from the PSO.
The idea of a PSO service is that the government subsidises an airline to fly a route which would not be economic. What is less recognised is that the airport can quietly extract quite a lot of cash from that too.
In the case of the last Kerry PSO contract award a few years ago (2018?) , Kerry Airport published two separate sets of fees and charges, one for ordinary commercial flights and one (much higher) for PSO flights. Now Ryanair won't even pay the normal commercial charge, but in the case of the PSO flights, no-one negotiates with the airport (the PSO airline doesn't care, because it's being reimbursed for whatever it pays, and the government doesn't care, because why rock the boat?). Plus, last time round, the PSO covered the cost of out-of-hours opening of the airport, while Ryanair took the benefit.
This two-tiered charging scheme for PSOs is not unique to Kerry. Donegal was doing something similar. Perhaps it also happens in other countries. It's just a very "convenient" :-) way for government to "quietly" funnel more money to regional airports, over and above publicly declared financial support.
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Northern Ireland
Posts: 2,790
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'd hardly think so, I'm guessing they'd need to double their passenger numbers to recover that. They've also fought hard to keep it, i.e. many moons ago when FR threatened to walk. I thoroughly enjoy the experience of the airport therw and am happy to pay the fee to support it. It's not my local airport but last year I chose a drive to NOC and reasonably priced parking above the mess that was Dublin Airport.
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Glasgow
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm sure it was said at one point that 1 million passengers a year was the point at which the development fer could be reassessed. However I suspect that if and when that number is reached, it won't be. A funding stream like that is something of a drug, once you have it it's very hard to let it go. Based on current passenger numbers, and allowing for under 12s not paying it, it must be generating close to €4m a year for the airport. I think any suggestion of ever increasing it due to inflation etc would be very poorly received however.
That has happened most Tuesday mornings this summer, not unusual to have two or three Ryanair aircraft holding over Leitrim at around half eight on a Tuesday morning. No further developments with the Apron or other proposed improvements that I'm aware of. It's an ambitious terminal and apron expansion proposal, one of those that will either happen in one big investment or won't happen at all.
![Smilie](https://www.pprune.org/images/smilies/smile.gif)
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Glasgow
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If you Google "Knock airport development plan pdf", and download the first link that comes up you will see the general proposals.
Page 65 shows the proposals for the terminal building itself. It's basically a major expansion of the apron to make space for a passenger boarding bridge, serving a (frankly excessive) 15 aircraft stands, as well as an additional taxiway to the runway. Would require significant investment, including relocation of the fuel bunds and major earthworks.
Page 65 shows the proposals for the terminal building itself. It's basically a major expansion of the apron to make space for a passenger boarding bridge, serving a (frankly excessive) 15 aircraft stands, as well as an additional taxiway to the runway. Would require significant investment, including relocation of the fuel bunds and major earthworks.
If you Google "Knock airport development plan pdf", and download the first link that comes up you will see the general proposals.
Page 65 shows the proposals for the terminal building itself. It's basically a major expansion of the apron to make space for a passenger boarding bridge, serving a (frankly excessive) 15 aircraft stands, as well as an additional taxiway to the runway. Would require significant investment, including relocation of the fuel bunds and major earthworks.
Page 65 shows the proposals for the terminal building itself. It's basically a major expansion of the apron to make space for a passenger boarding bridge, serving a (frankly excessive) 15 aircraft stands, as well as an additional taxiway to the runway. Would require significant investment, including relocation of the fuel bunds and major earthworks.
My understanding is Knock has three aircraft stands presently which are all occupied at one time or another fairly frequently. I know apron extension has been talked about in the past here, but how does this work presently?
The passenger walkway for boarding to/from Stand 3 crosses the main taxi lane into the apron. Does this mean anything on Stand 2 has to wait for passengers to board/disembark on Stand 3 before it can depart, and vice versa, or is Stand 3 used as a bussing gate when the other stands are occupied?
The passenger walkway for boarding to/from Stand 3 crosses the main taxi lane into the apron. Does this mean anything on Stand 2 has to wait for passengers to board/disembark on Stand 3 before it can depart, and vice versa, or is Stand 3 used as a bussing gate when the other stands are occupied?
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ireland
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune.org-vbulletin/666x622/irelandwest_apron__bcdc0a2bf9d195e11cee0996440e61c4b6c5f176.jpg)
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Northern Ireland
Posts: 2,790
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ryanair base
MOL said in an interview last week when he made extensive reference to DUB Apt Cap and EI pilots strike that it was likely that each of SNN, ORK and NOC would see expansion in the coming two years when 737M deliveries were on track. He specifically said NOC would be 2 AC base with an ambition to grow passengers to 1.5M per annum. Great if true. Hard to know if this is for real or for other purposes within the context.
Be great development for NOC if true. Clearly, to justify the extended opening hours, they'd need that scale of passengers to justify the extra cost.
Be great development for NOC if true. Clearly, to justify the extended opening hours, they'd need that scale of passengers to justify the extra cost.
Found the presentation MOL made to the Transport Committee.
Entire focus was aimed at lifting the Dublin cap.
Couple of titbits that were there to placate the rest.
Usual Ryanair PR stuff.
Lapped up by politicians and the unwashed masses.
Approx 10 min in he uses the words "would" in relation to Cork/Shannon but he "thinks" there's the potential for a base at Knock.
All predicated on getting his way in Dublin.
Wording is important. Ask a lawyer.
Many regional news feeds are presenting this as a done deal if only the meanies in Dublin airport could be made see things Ryanairs way.
Entire focus was aimed at lifting the Dublin cap.
Couple of titbits that were there to placate the rest.
Usual Ryanair PR stuff.
Lapped up by politicians and the unwashed masses.
Approx 10 min in he uses the words "would" in relation to Cork/Shannon but he "thinks" there's the potential for a base at Knock.
All predicated on getting his way in Dublin.
Wording is important. Ask a lawyer.
Many regional news feeds are presenting this as a done deal if only the meanies in Dublin airport could be made see things Ryanairs way.
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Northern Ireland
Posts: 2,790
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Found the presentation MOL made to the Transport Committee.
Entire focus was aimed at lifting the Dublin cap.
Couple of titbits that were there to placate the rest.
Usual Ryanair PR stuff.
Lapped up by politicians and the unwashed masses.
Approx 10 min in he uses the words "would" in relation to Cork/Shannon but he "thinks" there's the potential for a base at Knock.
All predicated on getting his way in Dublin.
Wording is important. Ask a lawyer.
Many regional news feeds are presenting this as a done deal if only the meanies in Dublin airport could be made see things Ryanairs way.
Entire focus was aimed at lifting the Dublin cap.
Couple of titbits that were there to placate the rest.
Usual Ryanair PR stuff.
Lapped up by politicians and the unwashed masses.
Approx 10 min in he uses the words "would" in relation to Cork/Shannon but he "thinks" there's the potential for a base at Knock.
All predicated on getting his way in Dublin.
Wording is important. Ask a lawyer.
Many regional news feeds are presenting this as a done deal if only the meanies in Dublin airport could be made see things Ryanairs way.
As MOL said years ago there is no such thing as bad publicity.
The danger of unquestioned parroting of Ryanair PR is that it assists Ryanair's aim to the detriment of the supposed beneficiary.
Local radio/paper has a banner headline of new services been launched.
This then puts pressure on local TD's to pressure the Minister for Transport..
Hey presto cap gets overruled by new SI.
But nothing for the patsy.
Ryanair wins.
The danger of unquestioned parroting of Ryanair PR is that it assists Ryanair's aim to the detriment of the supposed beneficiary.
Local radio/paper has a banner headline of new services been launched.
This then puts pressure on local TD's to pressure the Minister for Transport..
Hey presto cap gets overruled by new SI.
But nothing for the patsy.
Ryanair wins.
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Northern Ireland
Posts: 2,790
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I get your points, I think we know how Ryanair works. I'm all for the cap being lifted, any pressure that can be brought to bear on government or minister is welcome.
And equally any publicity for NOC is welcome if draws attention to the range of services available.
And equally any publicity for NOC is welcome if draws attention to the range of services available.