Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Airlines, Airports & Routes
Reload this Page >

bmi confirms Riyadh start

Wikiposts
Search
Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

bmi confirms Riyadh start

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 3rd Jul 2005, 21:19
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Angry

Quote: YoungPaul
____________________________________________________
If you really think the profitability of a longhaul flight has anything to do with how many people sit in economy then you have another think coming.
____________________________________________________

Oh ye of clever quick and not well thought out reply's:

You have obviousely missed the point in my previous post perhaps you should have taken a little more time to think about it.The profitability is mirrored in how many 'bums on seats' you have and also in the levels at which the fares were sold. My guess is that most booked well in advance so had the 'best' fares, i.e cheapest fares.

For an A330 that holds 244 passengers, thats 24 in business, 48 in Premium Economy and 172 in Economy to be exact.... a t.o.b of 53 passengers who ALL sat in economy is hardly going to make a profit unless the loads pick up.

And for the record YoungPaul, profitability would start at the front of the aircraft and not the back, C,D,J,I,R business fares being the highest from left to right! It would'nt matter if economy was empty, if business was full e.g all 24 seats taken by full C, D and J passengers ( 'I' being redemption fares and 'R' Duty Travel) the flight would be in profit!

Agent x has spoken!

Last edited by agent x; 3rd Jul 2005 at 21:41.
agent x is offline  
Old 4th Jul 2005, 02:17
  #22 (permalink)  

Rebel PPRuNer
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Toronto, Canada (formerly EICK)
Age: 51
Posts: 2,834
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
X and paul

easy with the trigger fingers. I think you are actually singing from the same hymnbook. X leaving out that there was 53 was the tob rather than just the Y figure did leave some room for interpretation.
MarkD is offline  
Old 4th Jul 2005, 16:36
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
53 pax were checked in and 53 boarded FormerFlyer it aint no rumour!!! How much more hard and confirmed do you want!!?

agent x is offline  
Old 4th Jul 2005, 18:29
  #24 (permalink)  

Lady Lexxington
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: The Manor House
Age: 44
Posts: 1,145
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just jumping to agent xs' defence, he does know how much each pax paid and trust me that flight is not in profit or anything even approching it! As I've said before lets hope the loads pick up when it goes daily.
lexxity is offline  
Old 4th Jul 2005, 21:03
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
thanx lexxity! At least someone is on my side and in agreement!
agent x is offline  
Old 4th Jul 2005, 21:20
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: USA
Age: 67
Posts: 2,183
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just curious.....but will the female crew,flight deck and cabin, encounter any special problems in KSA? How do other carriers deal with the particular brand of chauvinism rampant out there?
eastern wiseguy is offline  
Old 4th Jul 2005, 22:01
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Inside the M25
Posts: 2,404
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
All I was saying was that having 50 people in economy wasn't a necessary or sufficient indicator that a flight was making a loss - even on a 24/48/172 config aircraft - on N. Atlantic routes, if 20/24 were occupied at the front, the rest of the seats would be "don't care"s. Having ONLY 50 people in economy of course would make a loss - and had you said that, I wouldn't have replied as I did.
Young Paul is offline  
Old 4th Jul 2005, 22:10
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
no hard feelings then eh yougpaul, slight misunderstandings all round but i got the point across in the end, with the help of the lovely lexxity too!
agent x is offline  
Old 5th Jul 2005, 07:46
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Wherever my current employers wish to send me !!
Posts: 718
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You can bet yer bottom dollar that it'll be full when I try and get out on my annual free sby...
Little Blue is offline  
Old 5th Jul 2005, 13:14
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The beautiful North West of England, true home of the bmi 330.
Posts: 516
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I am sorry Jordon D, the flights I have operated (LHR-BOM-LHR) on with bmi are not full. Half full or even a third full....
The Royal Family is offline  
Old 5th Jul 2005, 16:10
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Manchester
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Anybody got any ideas re: Fares to Riyadh?
Wasta is offline  
Old 5th Jul 2005, 16:14
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: southern england
Posts: 1,650
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
wasta, all on the bmi site
newswatcher is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.