Liverpool -- READ the stickies!!!!!!!
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 1,236
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Given the above is correct (re seat capacity) this is the number of seats available PER WEEK:
LIVERPOOL
Rome FR = 1323
Milan FR = 1323
Pisa FR = 1323
Venice FR = 1323
TOTAL = 5292
MAN
Rome BA = 770
Milan BA = 954, AZ = 2100
Pisa BA = 698
Venice BA = 159
Naples MON = 1260
TOTAL = 5941
Liverpool totals prior to 28th Jan 2005 was nil, also there is a whisper that Naples will be a FR base in the future and will be linked to Liverpool.
LIVERPOOL
Rome FR = 1323
Milan FR = 1323
Pisa FR = 1323
Venice FR = 1323
TOTAL = 5292
MAN
Rome BA = 770
Milan BA = 954, AZ = 2100
Pisa BA = 698
Venice BA = 159
Naples MON = 1260
TOTAL = 5941
Liverpool totals prior to 28th Jan 2005 was nil, also there is a whisper that Naples will be a FR base in the future and will be linked to Liverpool.
![dwlpl is offline](https://www.pprune.org/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
Not Manchester
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Salford
Posts: 506
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ahem..... Alitalia operate the 126 pax A319 into MAN at the moment.
They're replacing it with the MD80 with 131 to 150 seats, depending on configuration.
That's an increase in capacity, albeit a small one.
There are simply more available seats between MAN and Italy than there are between LPL and Italy - fact. MAN is the larger of the two airports and is served by many more operators than LPL so this is not surprising.
Seeing as both are dwarfed by the available seats between LHR and LGW and Italy, let's keep things in perspective, eh?
They're replacing it with the MD80 with 131 to 150 seats, depending on configuration.
That's an increase in capacity, albeit a small one.
There are simply more available seats between MAN and Italy than there are between LPL and Italy - fact. MAN is the larger of the two airports and is served by many more operators than LPL so this is not surprising.
Seeing as both are dwarfed by the available seats between LHR and LGW and Italy, let's keep things in perspective, eh?
![Caslance is offline](https://www.pprune.org/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 1,236
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Considering that Liverpool, less than one month ago, had zero seats available to Italy, the airport is doing very well to have over 5000 seats available per week in another 2 months time.
![dwlpl is offline](https://www.pprune.org/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 323
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Lets see what reasons I could come up with for them to pull one
" I know! Alitalia is on it's knee's, skint, bust.
Hang on! just thougth of another, Ryanair.
What about the 184 bod's that flew into LPL yesterday
they could have used Alitalia but didn't they chose Ryanair."
![Ugh](https://www.pprune.org/images/smilies2/eusa_wall.gif)
" I know! Alitalia is on it's knee's, skint, bust.
Hang on! just thougth of another, Ryanair.
What about the 184 bod's that flew into LPL yesterday
they could have used Alitalia but didn't they chose Ryanair."
Last edited by Mouser; 26th Feb 2005 at 23:40.
![Mouser is offline](https://www.pprune.org/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
Not Manchester
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Salford
Posts: 506
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Angel](https://www.pprune.org/images/icons/mpangel.gif)
Yes, Mouser.
Another reasonable scenario would see Alitalia millking the route for all it's worth because they're making money on it.
If they were competing head-to-head and point-to-point with Ryanair it might be different. But they're not.
And that still leaves the Jet2 flights that dwlpl overlooked.
Anyway, all this MAN vs LPL stuff is silly - traffic at both is expanding year on year, to the benefit of the whole North West and further afield, too.
Another reasonable scenario would see Alitalia millking the route for all it's worth because they're making money on it.
If they were competing head-to-head and point-to-point with Ryanair it might be different. But they're not.
And that still leaves the Jet2 flights that dwlpl overlooked.
Anyway, all this MAN vs LPL stuff is silly - traffic at both is expanding year on year, to the benefit of the whole North West and further afield, too.
![Caslance is offline](https://www.pprune.org/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 1,236
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
..... as you will have seen in this mini-thread, my first post did not omit Jet2 but I forgot in my second post to include them, something that Ringwayman corrected before I could do so.
Re Alitalia, whats their past performance like at MAN. I seem to remember there schedules have disappeared on a number of occasions in the past.
Re Alitalia, whats their past performance like at MAN. I seem to remember there schedules have disappeared on a number of occasions in the past.
![dwlpl is offline](https://www.pprune.org/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
Not Manchester
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Salford
Posts: 506
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Seems to be pretty solid this time round, dwlpl.
The aircraft type was changed to the Emb170 for a short while last summer, but this had nothing to do with low pax figures and everything to do with the A319s being needed at home at the peak of the Italian holiday season.
The fact that many of the Emb170 flights were "doubled up" with an Emb145 speaks for itself, I think.
On at least one occasion recently, the A319 has been substituted with an A320.
All in all, the route seems healthy.
The aircraft type was changed to the Emb170 for a short while last summer, but this had nothing to do with low pax figures and everything to do with the A319s being needed at home at the peak of the Italian holiday season.
The fact that many of the Emb170 flights were "doubled up" with an Emb145 speaks for itself, I think.
On at least one occasion recently, the A319 has been substituted with an A320.
All in all, the route seems healthy.
![Caslance is offline](https://www.pprune.org/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 323
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What about the 184 pax into LPL paying lo-cost fares on Ryanair's first flight, there's no" it's early days" here straight in five empty seats only, this is the first real fight Alitalia/BA have had on this route. Choose a nice shinny 737-800 at lo-cost, or through the nose fares on a scruffy MD80 or even worse an RJ100 that might just get up to cruise altitude (27000ft) before we start to desend.
Last edited by Mouser; 26th Feb 2005 at 23:39.
![Mouser is offline](https://www.pprune.org/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 323
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I don't think you Manc's really feel threatened by LPL, but by the Christ if had your way LPL would be snuffed out. £16 million a year for back handers might do the trick.It seems expansion is good for the NorthWest when it's from Manchester.
![Mouser is offline](https://www.pprune.org/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
Not Manchester
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Salford
Posts: 506
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ah but in vino, veritas Mouser.
You need look no further than a few postings above your own to see
How's the head this morning?
You need look no further than a few postings above your own to see
Anyway, all this MAN vs LPL stuff is silly - traffic at both is expanding year on year, to the benefit of the whole North West and further afield, too.
![Evil](https://www.pprune.org/images/smilies/evil.gif)
![Caslance is offline](https://www.pprune.org/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Liverpool
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ryanair
Hi
Stated on the NWAN forum that in the next 4 years Ryanair might have up 16 based aircraft at LPL,but its only speculation.
http://www.xsorbit6.com/users/nwanfo...89379&start=15
Thanks
Michael
Stated on the NWAN forum that in the next 4 years Ryanair might have up 16 based aircraft at LPL,but its only speculation.
http://www.xsorbit6.com/users/nwanfo...89379&start=15
Thanks
Michael
![MichaelDoyle is offline](https://www.pprune.org/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: East Midlands Airport (EMA)
Posts: 906
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Is LPL/IOM the only route that Emerald's flyjem operation has? With three pax-configured ATPs you would have thought that the management team might have been able to carve out more routes, but instead they have allowed flybe to arrive and trample all over the possibility of more domestic routes from LPL. Will flyjem fight back, or do they even have any plans to expand?
I've never noticed, despite being a regular visitor to the North-West, any flyjem advertising, and I'm not even sure who their target market is? Are they a no-frills airline?
I think that EasyJet will definately defend their turf at LPL. They have rolled over & allowed baby & Ryanair to eat into their routes at EMA, but its a completely different scenario at LPL. From the looks of it, nobody really seems to be stepping on anybody;s toes, and I doubt flybe would operate some of their Med routes from LPL as this is definately EZY territory. Secondary cities in France, perhaps FR's. I don't know what will happen here ...
I've never noticed, despite being a regular visitor to the North-West, any flyjem advertising, and I'm not even sure who their target market is? Are they a no-frills airline?
I think that EasyJet will definately defend their turf at LPL. They have rolled over & allowed baby & Ryanair to eat into their routes at EMA, but its a completely different scenario at LPL. From the looks of it, nobody really seems to be stepping on anybody;s toes, and I doubt flybe would operate some of their Med routes from LPL as this is definately EZY territory. Secondary cities in France, perhaps FR's. I don't know what will happen here ...
![bmibaby.com is offline](https://www.pprune.org/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Liverpool
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Pax through 2004
Hi
Heres the passenger figures for LPL in 2004.Courtesy of dwlpl
ABERDEEN - Air Wales
2108, started November 2004
ALICANTE - easyJet
103655, 100580, +3%
AMSTERDAM - easyJet
361929, 393470, -8%
BARCELONA - easyJet
173046, 176037, -2%
BASEL - easyJet
57373, started March 2004
BELFAST INT - easyJet
551655, 563042, -2%
BERLIN Schoenfeld - easyJet
56179, started April 2004
BRUSSELS Charleroi - Ryanair
3692 stopped January 2004
BUDAPEST - Wizz Air
690, started December 2004
CARDIFF - Air Wales
1782, stopped January and restarted November 2004
COLOGNE/BONN - easyJet
41977, started June 2004
CONNAUGHT/KNOCK - Aer Arran
7434, started June 2004
CORK - JetMagic
821, stopped January 2004
DUBLIN - Ryanair, Aer Lingus
238129, 242647, -2%
GENEVA - easyJet
133390, 146003, -9%
GIRONA - Ryanair
102911, started February 2004
ISLE of MAN - EuroManx, BACX, flyJem
203774, 178692, +14%
KATOWICE - Wizz Air
2365, started December 2004
LONDON CITY - VLM
68275, started February 2004
MADRID - easyJet
93608, 90117, +4%
MALAGA - easyJet
243709, 235075, +4%
NEWCASTLE - Air Wales
45, finished January 2004
NICE - easyJet
139576, 140135, -0.4%
PALMA - easyJet
146090, 141407, +3%
PARIS CDG - easyJet
237004, 256997, -8%
WARSAW - Wizz Air
1801, started December 2004
Thanks
Michael
Heres the passenger figures for LPL in 2004.Courtesy of dwlpl
ABERDEEN - Air Wales
2108, started November 2004
ALICANTE - easyJet
103655, 100580, +3%
AMSTERDAM - easyJet
361929, 393470, -8%
BARCELONA - easyJet
173046, 176037, -2%
BASEL - easyJet
57373, started March 2004
BELFAST INT - easyJet
551655, 563042, -2%
BERLIN Schoenfeld - easyJet
56179, started April 2004
BRUSSELS Charleroi - Ryanair
3692 stopped January 2004
BUDAPEST - Wizz Air
690, started December 2004
CARDIFF - Air Wales
1782, stopped January and restarted November 2004
COLOGNE/BONN - easyJet
41977, started June 2004
CONNAUGHT/KNOCK - Aer Arran
7434, started June 2004
CORK - JetMagic
821, stopped January 2004
DUBLIN - Ryanair, Aer Lingus
238129, 242647, -2%
GENEVA - easyJet
133390, 146003, -9%
GIRONA - Ryanair
102911, started February 2004
ISLE of MAN - EuroManx, BACX, flyJem
203774, 178692, +14%
KATOWICE - Wizz Air
2365, started December 2004
LONDON CITY - VLM
68275, started February 2004
MADRID - easyJet
93608, 90117, +4%
MALAGA - easyJet
243709, 235075, +4%
NEWCASTLE - Air Wales
45, finished January 2004
NICE - easyJet
139576, 140135, -0.4%
PALMA - easyJet
146090, 141407, +3%
PARIS CDG - easyJet
237004, 256997, -8%
WARSAW - Wizz Air
1801, started December 2004
Thanks
Michael
![MichaelDoyle is offline](https://www.pprune.org/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)