30 injured in turbulence: Air Europa
I flew as a passenger recently and was amazed at the number of times cabin crew had to tell people to sit down even though the seatbelt sign was on. I can understand a few people who were out of their seats going to and from the toilets being injured, as well as cabin crew doing their jobs, but if thirty are hurt then something is wrong.
It’s time airlines insisted on passengers using seatbelts all the time they are in their seats, otherwise no compensation if injured. There is a high level of compliance from motorists due to the heavy fines involved, there needs to be a similar mindset on aircraft that when seated, belts are to be used.
It’s time airlines insisted on passengers using seatbelts all the time they are in their seats, otherwise no compensation if injured. There is a high level of compliance from motorists due to the heavy fines involved, there needs to be a similar mindset on aircraft that when seated, belts are to be used.
It’s time airlines insisted on passengers using seatbelts all the time they are in their seats, otherwise no compensation if injured. There is a high level of compliance from motorists due to the heavy fines involved, there needs to be a similar mindset on aircraft that when seated, belts are to be used.
In the early days of compulsion there were EXTENSIVE tv ads - "clunk click every trip" became a mantra, and rthen when rear seatbelts were intoduced "beware of the unrestrained granny in the back" (rather good!). I suggest that that sort of activity is FAR more effective, achievable and value for money than attempted enforcement alone.
Perhaps allowing the use of cudgels by the cabin crew to enforce the value of remaining belted as much as practicable would work? Wallop someone who is not wearing the belt and then click the belt together and explain to the rest of the passengers how and why this was done. See if anyone else wants help with the seat belt but has been too shy to ask. When the first one comes to, explain the plane hit some turbulence and they were knocked out because the belt wasn't secured.
![](/images/avatars/th_new.gif)
Join Date: Jan 2024
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I flew as a passenger recently and was amazed at the number of times cabin crew had to tell people to sit down even though the seatbelt sign was on. I can understand a few people who were out of their seats going to and from the toilets being injured, as well as cabin crew doing their jobs, but if thirty are hurt then something is wrong.
It’s time airlines insisted on passengers using seatbelts all the time they are in their seats, otherwise no compensation if injured.
The following users liked this post:
The following users liked this post:
The following users liked this post:
Washington Post article:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world...ulence-brazil/
And more descriptive of what happened in the cabin in the Independent:
https://www.independent.co.uk/travel...-b2572288.html
Maybe for airliners to copy/paste this text and present it to passengers on the taxi roll...
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world...ulence-brazil/
And more descriptive of what happened in the cabin in the Independent:
https://www.independent.co.uk/travel...-b2572288.html
Maybe for airliners to copy/paste this text and present it to passengers on the taxi roll...
.....Another passenger, Romina Apai, said the man sitting next to her "got stuck in the roof, in the bin. We could not find him"......
Last edited by 51bravo; 2nd Jul 2024 at 12:55.
Do we know if any turbulence was expected? Do we know if the seat belt sign was on? Do we know if some of the injured were cabin personnel going about their business? Do we know if some of the injured passengers were in fact in their seats with belts on but got clobbered by something or someone? So often we see the self-righteous brigade make all sort of assumptions based on pure speculation. Perhaps we should have a Turbulence Events forum specially for them.
![](/images/avatars/th_new.gif)
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Do we know if any turbulence was expected? Do we know if the seat belt sign was on? Do we know if some of the injured were cabin personnel going about their business? Do we know if some of the injured passengers were in fact in their seats with belts on but got clobbered by something or someone? So often we see the self-righteous brigade make all sort of assumptions based on pure speculation. Perhaps we should have a Turbulence Events forum specially for them.
Telling people that they won't be compensated if they don't have their belts fastened, or making them responsible for damage will have zero effect. People don't fasten their belts because they don't think anything will bad will happen - and odds are they are right. People drive around in cars all the time - the odds that they'll be in an accident on any particular trip is very, very small.
So 99.999% of the time there is no consequence for not buckling up.
If you told someone that - on this particular trip, the odds were 99% that they would be in an accident (or heavy turbulence) - they would make damn sure the belt was tightly fastened.
I buckle up religiously - in autos and on aircraft - because I know there is that .0001% that this will be the trip that something bad happens. Lots of people don't think that way.
So 99.999% of the time there is no consequence for not buckling up.
If you told someone that - on this particular trip, the odds were 99% that they would be in an accident (or heavy turbulence) - they would make damn sure the belt was tightly fastened.
I buckle up religiously - in autos and on aircraft - because I know there is that .0001% that this will be the trip that something bad happens. Lots of people don't think that way.
![](/images/avatars/th_new.gif)
Join Date: Jan 2024
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Telling people that they won't be compensated if they don't have their belts fastened, or making them responsible for damage will have zero effect. People don't fasten their belts because they don't think anything will bad will happen - and odds are they are right. People drive around in cars all the time - the odds that they'll be in an accident on any particular trip is very, very small.
So 99.999% of the time there is no consequence for not buckling up.
If you told someone that - on this particular trip, the odds were 99% that they would be in an accident (or heavy turbulence) - they would make damn sure the belt was tightly fastened.
I buckle up religiously - in autos and on aircraft - because I know there is that .0001% that this will be the trip that something bad happens. Lots of people don't think that way.
So 99.999% of the time there is no consequence for not buckling up.
If you told someone that - on this particular trip, the odds were 99% that they would be in an accident (or heavy turbulence) - they would make damn sure the belt was tightly fastened.
I buckle up religiously - in autos and on aircraft - because I know there is that .0001% that this will be the trip that something bad happens. Lots of people don't think that way.
I wonder how much it would cost to put weight sensors in future airline seats? Something like that could be used in interesting ways to nudge passengers into making buckling up a habit.
We could just make a turbulence check SOP. Initiate A gentle dive maybe - Passengers will know it's coming - just not when.
Heck we could charge em $20 if they want a little card from the In Flight crew telling them exactly when.
Heck we could charge em $20 if they want a little card from the In Flight crew telling them exactly when.