Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Accidents and Close Calls
Reload this Page >

Korean Air Flight KE189 decompression incident

Wikiposts
Search
Accidents and Close Calls Discussion on accidents, close calls, and other unplanned aviation events, so we can learn from them, and be better pilots ourselves.

Korean Air Flight KE189 decompression incident

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 26th Jun 2024, 10:01
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: near an airplane
Posts: 2,852
Received 76 Likes on 54 Posts
Originally Posted by Heidhurtin
Just out of interest, if the cabin pressurisation system failed (I know it's extremely unlikely), how long would it take for the pressure to drop to external values? I also assume there's all sorts of warning bells and whistles to let the sharp end know there's a problem before it requires a "plummet"? (Gotta love that word).
That basically depends on the size of the hole through which air is departing the cabin. I did not read up on this incident, but assuming that the outflow valve controller failed and left the valve stuck in a particular position, it rather depends on that position. With the valve stuck half open/closed, switching the aircondition to high flow will delay the process a bit but depressurisation to ambient pressure may take quite some time still.
Bells and whistles.... the system will flag a controller not functioning properly, but cabin altitude warnings are less extensive. Mostly a warning horn when cabin altitude exceeds 10,000 feet. But that is based on an older 737 subtype, I am not familiar with the extra options on the MAX family.
Jhieminga is offline  
Old 27th Jun 2024, 07:16
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Sudbury, Suffolk
Posts: 268
Received 5 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by OldnGrounded

SQUAWKIDENT is correct that it's not an accident or close call, but it is an interesting incident. And I doubt that the OP knowingly posted clickbait. But please include sources and links, folks.
If pax have been hospitalised I suggest that the event is DEFINITELY reportable.
Maninthebar is offline  
Old 27th Jun 2024, 13:11
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Under the radar, over the rainbow
Posts: 822
Received 13 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by Maninthebar
If pax have been hospitalised I suggest that the event is DEFINITELY reportable.
I think the news reports I've seen (maybe excepting the worst of the clickbait yellow journalism) indicated that some pax were taken to hospital and quickly released after examination and perhaps some treatment. That wouldn't count as "serious injury" under FAR 49 Part 830.

Serious injury means any injury which: Requires hospitalization for more than 48 hours, commencing within 7 days from the date of the injury was received; (2) results in a fracture of any bone (except simple fractures of fingers, toes, or nose); (3) causes severe hemorrhages, nerve, muscle, or tendon damage; (4) involves any internal organ; or (5) involves second- or third-degree burns, or any burns affecting more than 5 percent of the body surface.
So, if the news reports are correct, the KE189 depressurization wouldn't be a reportable accident, due to injuries, under US rules. No idea what South Korean rules say. Whatever, I think it's an appropriate incident for discussion here — and the mods haven't moved it, at least not yet.
OldnGrounded is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.