Fatal Lockheed 12 crash at Chino, 15 Jun 2024
Gnome de PPRuNe
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Too close to Croydon for comfort
Age: 60
Posts: 12,897
Received 480 Likes
on
271 Posts
Fatal Lockheed 12 crash at Chino, 15 Jun 2024
Sadly two people have died following the crash of a Lockheed 12 Electra Junior on take off at Chino - operated by the Yanks museum who appear to have had an event going on.
https://asn.flightsafety.org/wikibase/389722
https://asn.flightsafety.org/wikibase/389722
Horrible. RIP to the two who died, strength and condolences to their families, friends and those who worked alongside them.
https://channel3now.com/2024/06/15/2...ardino-county/
https://channel3now.com/2024/06/15/2...ardino-county/
The following users liked this post:
Gnome de PPRuNe
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Too close to Croydon for comfort
Age: 60
Posts: 12,897
Received 480 Likes
on
271 Posts
Here's the pic below - also seen a video (on ASN) but too far away to see if flaps were indeed fully down. Aircraft flying very slowly, stall spin to port.
![](https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune.org-vbulletin/831x474/screenshot_2024_06_17_110158_4f82c64793cbfbc483e4ecdc35a98d1610cea4c2.png)
![](https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune.org-vbulletin/831x474/screenshot_2024_06_17_110158_4f82c64793cbfbc483e4ecdc35a98d1610cea4c2.png)
I am assuming these are hydraulic flaps?
Maybe a cockpit flap display malfunctioned.
![](https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune.org-vbulletin/1024x768/image_c6d2898fd74152b26e9c2a44503915886fef1b29.jpeg)
Drain Bamaged
They look in transition in this picture, not fully extended yet as shown later on.
Why will be the big question.
On a side note, Blancolirio was mentioning in his video (Post #5) That yes, the flaps and gear are operated electrically and by "Plungers" Not by the traditional more ergonomic switches.
Why will be the big question.
On a side note, Blancolirio was mentioning in his video (Post #5) That yes, the flaps and gear are operated electrically and by "Plungers" Not by the traditional more ergonomic switches.
Last edited by ehwatezedoing; 18th Jun 2024 at 09:54.
Gnome de PPRuNe
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Too close to Croydon for comfort
Age: 60
Posts: 12,897
Received 480 Likes
on
271 Posts
Another Lockheed 12 has been seriously damaged in a runway excursion in Georgia. Crew reported as seriously injured... ![Frown](https://www.pprune.org/images/smilies/sowee.gif)
https://asn.flightsafety.org/wikibase/389804
![Frown](https://www.pprune.org/images/smilies/sowee.gif)
https://asn.flightsafety.org/wikibase/389804
Gnome de PPRuNe
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Too close to Croydon for comfort
Age: 60
Posts: 12,897
Received 480 Likes
on
271 Posts
Apparently been confirmed by his son that Dan Gryder was one of those injured in the Georgia accident.
https://www.flyingmag.com/news/3-lef...eed-12a-crash/
https://www.flyingmag.com/news/3-lef...eed-12a-crash/
Used to do quite a bit of flying in the aircraft in my youth as a pax. The gear and flaps are both electric as mentioned above, the plungers for operation are immediately below the throttle quadrant.
![](https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune.org-vbulletin/1011x849/l11_3d43b092ad2bc903d1a560cefc58da569481d4b7.png)
![](https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune.org-vbulletin/1011x849/l11_3d43b092ad2bc903d1a560cefc58da569481d4b7.png)
Moderator
I have no knowledge of the pilots flying the airplane, nor the factors in the event itself. I do observe from the photo above that this airplane's secondary controls were [obviously] designed long before the design requirement for standardization of engine, gear and flap controls (location, operation, knob shape and colour). The result can be that today's pilots, as skilled as they may be, can still be caught out by a cockpit configuration which differs from the standardization which came into final effect for airplanes certified after 1986. For those of use who fly antique airplanes, it's worth remembering that the arrangement in the cockpit may differ, and not protect one's self from mistakes as a more recently made airplane might.
There was mention of flap position for takeoff. Though I have no knowledge of this type, an example of a split flap airplane using some flap for takeoff would be the Cessna 310, which specifies 15 flap for takeoff. I'm certain that there are other split flap airplanes, for which some flap may be used for takeoff...
There was mention of flap position for takeoff. Though I have no knowledge of this type, an example of a split flap airplane using some flap for takeoff would be the Cessna 310, which specifies 15 flap for takeoff. I'm certain that there are other split flap airplanes, for which some flap may be used for takeoff...
Surely an aircraft should be flyable even with full flaps extended. Consider the case of a go-around after approaching with gear down and full flap. During the GA the gear will be retracted immediately but the flaps will take time to retract. Or in the case of the Lockheed 12 are you committed to landing once the flaps are fully extended?
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Near Stuttgart, Germany
Posts: 1,103
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Flyable, yes. Able to climb? Maybe, maybe not. This was an "antique" aircraft not built to modern standards. Maybe they did not set maximum power for takeoff in oder to preserve the engines.
I know it the other way round: "Go-around - Flap takeoff position ..... positive climb - Gear Up" which makes a lot more sense because at low speed the gear usually produces less drag than the flaps in landing position. Depending on type of course.
I know it the other way round: "Go-around - Flap takeoff position ..... positive climb - Gear Up" which makes a lot more sense because at low speed the gear usually produces less drag than the flaps in landing position. Depending on type of course.
Surely an aircraft should be flyable even with full flaps extended. Consider the case of a go-around after approaching with gear down and full flap. During the GA the gear will be retracted immediately but the flaps will take time to retract. Or in the case of the Lockheed 12 are you committed to landing once the flaps are fully extended?
Back in those days pretty much anything goes and they took somewhat of a Darwinistic approach to aircraft design and manufacture.
Whomever crashed the least kinda thing.
There were no human-machine interaction/interface studies, no human factors studies. Just an attitude of we need to fit this in somewhere somehow.
Last edited by B2N2; 20th Jun 2024 at 15:55.